Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix deadlock with request based dm and some drivers
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:14:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5098FF26.4070907@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5098F47F.9030201@fusionio.com>

(Cc to dm-devel)

On 11/06/12 20:29, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I recently fixed a deadlock for a customer we have with
> the below patch. I have queued it up in my tree as not
> to lose it. Can I have an ack from you, or do you want
> to submit it yourself? I've marked it stable as well.

Could you tell details about how the deadlock happened?

dm's end_io always throws the completion handling to softirq:
  end_clone_request()
    dm_complete_request()
      blk_complete_request()

then it is processed in softirq context:
  dm_softirq_done()
    dm_done()
      dm_end_request()
        rq_completed(run_queue=true)
          blk_run_queue()

Since queue_lock is always held with interrupt disabled,
I couldn't see why it could deadlock.

Request-based dm followed the completion model of scsi
mid layer. So similar code path exists in scsi, too.
For example:
  scsi_request_fn()
    scsi_kill_request()
      blk_complete_request()
then:
  scsi_softirq_done()
    scsi_io_completion()
      scsi_next_command()
        scsi_run_queue()
          spin_lock queue_lock
          __blk_run_queue()

If calling run-queue from softirq_done_fn() can cause deadlock,
I'm afraid the problem is not limited to dm.

> From 8ca211056519ac06bc96fb134dca1f8eb2141407 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:24:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix deadlock with request based dm and queue request_fn
>  recursion
> 
> Request based dm attempts to re-run the request queue off the
> request completion path. If used with a driver that potentially does
> end_io from its request_fn, we could deadlock trying to recurse
> back into request dispatch. Fix this by punting the request queue
> run to kblockd.
> 
> Tested to fix a quickly reproducible deadlock in such a scenario.
> 
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 02db918..77e6eff 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -740,8 +740,14 @@ static void rq_completed(struct mapped_device *md, int rw, int run_queue)
>  	if (!md_in_flight(md))
>  		wake_up(&md->wait);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Run this off this callpath, as drivers could invoke end_io while
> +	 * inside their request_fn (and holding the queue lock). Calling
> +	 * back into ->request_fn() could deadlock attempting to grab the
> +	 * queue lock again.
> +	 */
>  	if (run_queue)
> -		blk_run_queue(md->queue);
> +		blk_run_queue_async(md->queue);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * dm_put() must be at the end of this function. See the comment above


-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation

       reply	other threads:[~2012-11-06 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5098F47F.9030201@fusionio.com>
2012-11-06 12:14 ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
2012-11-06 12:35   ` [PATCH] Fix deadlock with request based dm and some drivers Jens Axboe
2012-11-07  0:15     ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-11-07  8:00       ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-07  8:35         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-11-07 10:59           ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5098FF26.4070907@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox