From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" <lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [LSF/MM ATTEND][LSF/MM TOPIC] Multipath redesign
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:10:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56961493.5010901@suse.de> (raw)
Hi all,
I'd like to attend LSF/MM and would like to present my ideas for a
multipath redesign.
The overall idea is to break up the centralized multipath handling
in device-mapper (and multipath-tools) and delegate to the
appropriate sub-systems.
Individually the plan is:
a) use the 'wwid' sysfs attribute to detect multipath devices;
this removes the need of the current 'path_id' functionality
in multipath-tools
b) leverage topology information from scsi_dh_alua (which we will
have once my ALUA handler update is in) to detect the multipath
topology. This removes the need of a 'prio' infrastructure
in multipath-tools
c) implement block or scsi events whenever a remote port becomes
unavailable. This removes the need of the 'path_checker'
functionality in multipath-tools.
d) leverage these events to handle path-up/path-down events
in-kernel
e) move the I/O redirection logic out of device-mapper proper
and use blk-mq to redirect I/O. This is still a bit of
hand-waving, and definitely would need discussion to figure
out if and how it can be achieved.
This is basically the same topic Mike Snitzer proposed, but
coming from a different angle.
But in the end we should be able to do strip down the current
(rather complex) multipath-tools to just handle topology changes;
everything else will be done internally.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 9:10 Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2016-01-13 10:50 ` [LSF/MM ATTEND][LSF/MM TOPIC] Multipath redesign Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-13 11:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-13 15:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-13 16:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-13 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-13 16:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-13 16:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-13 16:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-13 11:08 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2016-01-13 11:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-13 11:25 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2016-01-13 17:52 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-14 7:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-14 19:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-01-15 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-21 0:38 ` Benjamin Marzinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56961493.5010901@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox