From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: I/O block when removing thin device on the same pool
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:27:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569F6F08.1040503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTMprME2=oCyjxNxLPsXcgSsAzcBW2-dLjjN1CNPAPe0w-bow@mail.gmail.com>
Dne 20.1.2016 v 11:05 Dennis Yang napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I had noticed that I/O requests to one thin device will be blocked
> when the other thin device is being deleting. The root cause of this
> is that to delete a thin device will eventually call dm_btree_del()
> which is a slow function and can block. This means that the device
> deleting process will need to hold the pool lock for a very long time
> to wait for this function to delete the whole data mapping subtree.
> Since I/O to the devices on the same pool needs to held the same pool
> lock to lookup/insert/delete data mapping, all I/O will be blocked
> until the delete process finish.
>
> For now, I have to discard all the mappings of a thin device before
> deleting it to prevent I/O from being blocked. Since these discard
> requests not only take lots of time to finish but hurt the pool I/O
> throughput, I am still looking for other better solutions to fix this
> issue.
>
> I think the main problem is still the big pool lock in dm-thin which
> hurts both the scalability and performance of. I am wondering if there
> is any plan on improving this or any better fix for the I/O block
> problem.
Hi
What is your use case.
You may possibly split the load between several thin-pools ?
Current design is not targeted to simultaneously maintain very large number
of active thin-volumes within a single thin-pool.
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-20 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 10:05 I/O block when removing thin device on the same pool Dennis Yang
2016-01-20 11:27 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2016-01-20 16:17 ` Dennis Yang
2016-01-21 17:33 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-01-21 19:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-22 13:38 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-01-22 13:58 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-01-22 16:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-22 16:43 ` Joe Thornber
2016-01-25 9:13 ` Dennis Yang
2016-01-26 16:19 ` Joe Thornber
2016-01-27 4:51 ` Dennis Yang
2016-01-28 10:44 ` Joe Thornber
2016-01-29 11:01 ` Dennis Yang
2016-01-29 16:05 ` Joe Thornber
2016-02-01 3:52 ` Dennis Yang
2016-01-29 14:50 ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-01-29 16:04 ` Joe Thornber
2016-02-01 17:40 ` Lars Ellenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569F6F08.1040503@redhat.com \
--to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox