From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>, Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>,
DM-DEVEL ML <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] multipath-tools: replace round-robin path selector with the default for NFINIDAT/InfiniBox
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 12:22:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c8078a2-4f59-4cc0-9548-eee37f4b0e40@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCIr3r6KqyumN4Pt@redhat.com>
On 5/12/25 7:11 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 04:22:40PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
>> On Fri, 2025-05-09 at 16:08 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
>>>
>>> This code is from 55da608 ("libmultipath: update INFINIDAT builtin
>>> config"), signed-off by arnony@infinidat.com. We usually don't change
>>> defaults from explicit vendor recommendations without consent from
>>> the
>>> vendor. I've added Arnon to cc, maybe he wants to comment on your
>>> suggestion.
>>
>> Arnon's email address bounces. Unless we find someone else from
>> Infinidat to comment, I think we should keep the current default. Users
>> are free to override the defaults if the aren't happy with the
>> performance.
>
> I agree. This device config was set to round-robin after we switched the
> default to service-time, so I think it's reasonable to assume that this
> was intentional. Barring an email or updated documentation from
> INFINIDAT that shows it's no longer the recommended config, I feel like
> we should leave it as is.
At Infinidat support site(user required), there are new configs for SLES 15 and RHEL 8, or above:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczPhlOIUXYWsuCYQJ42ORS_77xnwTmlN02ZkDU4__6jAvQ_6bBLvvcFsQ9luhSMcB887pXZOaVCrCNZUITTl8eEztD7l568BTSNHL2cB9Dh2SfAAXye7K9Tu8nkjCKMkhQM4H7LRiY4Rp0ygQqCrMmM=w0-h0
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczMchJ6bcMIohp_g3Ik5DS6BZv_IW0iwaEXf968sJsR8fr_p3mR4ThRpmHpZE_VMnlcV8j0uuuI2kz-eoqekRCUBxyTBKS7n-4WFMsUiecq8i7nIjEuhfZFrV54DBQLDzGt6ofakAAF1L-ZcAuCWW18=w0-h0
device {
vendor "NFINIDAT"
product "InfiniBox"
path_grouping_policy "group_by_prio"
path_checker "tur"
features 0
hardware_handler "1 alua"
prio "alua"
rr_weight "priorities"
no_path_retry "queue"
rr_min_io 1
rr_min_io_rq 1
flush_on_last_del "yes"
fast_io_fail_tmo 15
dev_loss_tmo "infinity"
path_selector "service-time 0"
failback "immediate"
detect_prio "no"
user_friendly_names "no"
}
I will send a new patch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-16 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 13:44 [PATCH] multipath-tools: replace round-robin path selector with the default for NFINIDAT/InfiniBox Xose Vazquez Perez
2025-05-09 14:08 ` Martin Wilck
2025-05-09 14:21 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2025-05-09 14:22 ` Martin Wilck
2025-05-12 17:11 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-08-16 10:22 ` Xose Vazquez Perez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c8078a2-4f59-4cc0-9548-eee37f4b0e40@gmail.com \
--to=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).