From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: dm snapshot: Use kmalloc_array() in init_origin_hash() Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:45:41 +0200 Message-ID: <80feaa7d-7845-976a-a038-15da80283df8@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <080668d9-1e1e-e208-f9ea-ff718e8070e5@users.sourceforge.net> <3861d349-48fd-162b-a749-83e007f70b41@users.sourceforge.net> <1475142864.31297.5.camel@tiscali.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1475142864.31297.5.camel@tiscali.nl> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Bolle Cc: Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Shaohua Li , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Paolo Bonzini List-Id: dm-devel.ids > We have no hope of fixing Markus' homegrown coccinelle script. I have got an other impression. I see further possibilities to clarify involved communication and software development challenges for a few source code search patterns. How do you think about to discuss the corresponding collateral evolution a bit more? Are there any more constraints to consider? Regards, Markus