From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: md/dm-crypt: Rename a jump label in crypt_message() ?
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:53:53 +0200
Message-ID: <9d9cde54-b701-aac6-0bb8-4ba65c5046c2@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <7c232017-e291-fd2d-5516-26e5150d90df@users.sourceforge.net>
 <db29ff0c-8da9-e7ba-054d-a35f8b4fd2d7@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20160929125553.kn45yx6jud35463p@thunk.org>
 <e40a8107-7400-bc10-a212-563dd168aac5@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20160930100603.GB13620@mwanda>
 <d9c6668b-65b3-e410-81ed-1e43c227f015@users.sourceforge.net>
 <87mvip1us4.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87mvip1us4.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

> When someone tells you that you are wasting their time,

This information can be useful to some degree


> then that is not a subject for further discussion.

I got an other impression. I guess that there are constraints for such a response
which can become interesting for further considerations.

Is it just usual that other software changes are more welcome?

Regards,
Markus