From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>
To: Bernd Broermann <bernd@broermann.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: path_grouping_policy group_by_serial prio question
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:48:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABr-Gne6uk8=SbOM8bHccnXLYHVZFGCRKbkRGNBF7SwJ39fhnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de2a545fcd595b05011ba8cd715d484a@broermann.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2098 bytes --]
Hi,
the path_grouping_policy is only responsible for the path grouping.
The "emc" prioritizer here, attributes a prio to each path.
Priorities of paths in the same group are aggregated into a pathgroup
priority.
The pathgroup with the highest priority is activated.
Best regards,
Christophe Varoqui
www.opensvc.com
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Bernd Broermann <bernd@broermann.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Does "group_by_serial" activate the "low latency" path ?
>
> There are two servers which have a separate path to a EMC VPLEX box in
> different Data centers ( DC1 , DC2 ) .
>
> Because of latency the paths are grouped by the serial number of the VPLEX
> box.
>
>
>
>
> DC1 DC2
>
> +------------+ +------------+
> | Server 1 | | Server 2 |
> +------------+ +------------+
> | \ / |
> | \ / |
> | \ / |
> | \ / |
> | X |
> | / \ |
> | / \ |
> | / \ |
> | / \ |
> +------------+ +------------+
> |disk VPLEX A| |disk VPLEX B|
> +------------+ +------------+
>
>
> As I expected the paths are grouped and the path to the "nearest" disk(
> VPLEX) is active.
>
> Is this an coincidence or does it work as designed ?
>
> I didn't find something enlightening in the dm documentation.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Bernd
>
>
>
> partitial output of "multipathd show config"
> ....
> device {
> vendor "EMC"
> product "Invista"
> product_blacklist "LUNZ"
> path_grouping_policy group_by_serial
> getuid_callout "/lib/udev/scsi_id --whitelisted --device=/dev/%n"
> path_selector "round-robin 0"
> path_checker tur
> features "0"
> hardware_handler "1 emc"
> prio emc
> rr_weight uniform
> no_path_retry fail
> rr_min_io 1000
> rr_min_io_rq 1
> detect_prio yes
> }
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3562 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 12:03 path_grouping_policy group_by_serial prio question Bernd Broermann
2016-03-08 12:48 ` Christophe Varoqui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABr-Gne6uk8=SbOM8bHccnXLYHVZFGCRKbkRGNBF7SwJ39fhnA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=bernd@broermann.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).