From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0285C4320A for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 401EA60F5C for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:10:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 401EA60F5C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-468-I6Wd_c8pNRC0SCjmL6Qcvw-1; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:10:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: I6Wd_c8pNRC0SCjmL6Qcvw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38065801B3D; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF8B5D6AD; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6397F4BB7C; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 17HD9u5t025210 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:09:56 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E780B200BFD7; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast03.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2DAA21417F8 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FC7802A64 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-308-S9MHNekjMuWgM4LSSMj6JA-1; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:09:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: S9MHNekjMuWgM4LSSMj6JA-1 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36DA560F22; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:09:44 +0200 From: Greg KH To: SelvaKumar S Message-ID: References: <20210817101423.12367-1-selvakuma.s1@samsung.com> <20210817101423.12367-5-selvakuma.s1@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210817101423.12367-5-selvakuma.s1@samsung.com> X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: snitzer@redhat.com, djwong@kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, agk@redhat.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nitheshshetty@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org, nj.shetty@samsung.com, kch@kernel.org, selvajove@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com, javier.gonz@samsung.com, kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, damien.lemoal@wdc.com, joshi.k@samsung.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, joshiiitr@gmail.com, asml.silence@gmail.com Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 4/7] block: Introduce a new ioctl for simple copy X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:44:20PM +0530, SelvaKumar S wrote: > From: Nitesh Shetty > > Add new BLKCOPY ioctl that offloads copying of one or more sources ranges > to a destination in the device. COPY ioctl accepts a 'copy_range' > structure that contains destination (in sectors), no of sources and > pointer to the array of source ranges. Each source range is represented by > 'range_entry' that contains start and length of source ranges (in sectors) > > MAX_COPY_NR_RANGE, limits the number of entries for the IOCTL and > MAX_COPY_TOTAL_LENGTH limits the total copy length, IOCTL can handle. > > Example code, to issue BLKCOPY: > /* Sample example to copy three source-ranges [0, 8] [16, 8] [32,8] to > * [64,24], on the same device */ > > int main(void) > { > int ret, fd; > struct range_entry source_range[] = {{.src = 0, .len = 8}, > {.src = 16, .len = 8}, {.src = 32, .len = 8},}; > struct copy_range cr; > > cr.dest = 64; > cr.nr_range = 3; > cr.range_list = (__u64)&source_range; > > fd = open("/dev/nvme0n1", O_RDWR); > if (fd < 0) return 1; > > ret = ioctl(fd, BLKCOPY, &cr); > if (ret < 0) printf("copy failure\n"); > > close(fd); > > return ret; > } > > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty > Signed-off-by: SelvaKumar S > Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi > --- > block/ioctl.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c > index eb0491e90b9a..2af56d01e9fe 100644 > --- a/block/ioctl.c > +++ b/block/ioctl.c > @@ -143,6 +143,37 @@ static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, > GFP_KERNEL, flags); > } > > +static int blk_ioctl_copy(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, > + unsigned long arg) > +{ > + struct copy_range crange; > + struct range_entry *rlist; > + int ret; > + > + if (!(mode & FMODE_WRITE)) > + return -EBADF; > + > + if (copy_from_user(&crange, (void __user *)arg, sizeof(crange))) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + rlist = kmalloc_array(crange.nr_range, sizeof(*rlist), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!rlist) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + if (copy_from_user(rlist, (void __user *)crange.range_list, > + sizeof(*rlist) * crange.nr_range)) { > + ret = -EFAULT; > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = blkdev_issue_copy(bdev, crange.nr_range, rlist, bdev, crange.dest, > + GFP_KERNEL, 0); > +out: > + kfree(rlist); > + return ret; > +} > + > static int blk_ioctl_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, > unsigned long arg) > { > @@ -468,6 +499,8 @@ static int blkdev_common_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, > case BLKSECDISCARD: > return blk_ioctl_discard(bdev, mode, arg, > BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE); > + case BLKCOPY: > + return blk_ioctl_copy(bdev, mode, arg); > case BLKZEROOUT: > return blk_ioctl_zeroout(bdev, mode, arg); > case BLKGETDISKSEQ: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h > index 7a97b588d892..4183688ff398 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h > @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ struct range_entry { > __u64 len; > }; > > +struct copy_range { > + __u64 dest; > + __u64 nr_range; > + __u64 range_list; > + __u64 rsvd; If you have a "reserved" field, you HAVE to check that it is 0. If not, you can never use it in the future. Also, you can spell it out, we have lots of vowels :) thanks, greg k-h -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel