From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72DBC4338F for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6922260F35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:21:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6922260F35 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-49-1LioQvBWMFiSblPrWcbMLw-1; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:21:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1LioQvBWMFiSblPrWcbMLw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72673871807; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB136091B; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D4A181A2A7; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 17HDL2j9026706 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:21:03 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id B9063100CBC9; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast06.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B474F1009B9A for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99942185A794 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-383-VAKma_bHMzGPrpOQY6B_QA-1; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:20:58 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VAKma_bHMzGPrpOQY6B_QA-1 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444E1580B2A; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:10:54 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrleefgdeivdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfm jfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeuheejgf ffgfeivddukedvkedtleelleeghfeljeeiueeggeevueduudekvdetnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrd gtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:10:48 +0200 From: Greg KH To: SelvaKumar S Message-ID: References: <20210817101423.12367-1-selvakuma.s1@samsung.com> <20210817101423.12367-5-selvakuma.s1@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210817101423.12367-5-selvakuma.s1@samsung.com> X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: snitzer@redhat.com, djwong@kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, agk@redhat.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nitheshshetty@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org, nj.shetty@samsung.com, kch@kernel.org, selvajove@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com, javier.gonz@samsung.com, kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, damien.lemoal@wdc.com, joshi.k@samsung.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, joshiiitr@gmail.com, asml.silence@gmail.com Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 4/7] block: Introduce a new ioctl for simple copy X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:44:20PM +0530, SelvaKumar S wrote: > From: Nitesh Shetty > > Add new BLKCOPY ioctl that offloads copying of one or more sources ranges > to a destination in the device. COPY ioctl accepts a 'copy_range' > structure that contains destination (in sectors), no of sources and > pointer to the array of source ranges. Each source range is represented by > 'range_entry' that contains start and length of source ranges (in sectors) > > MAX_COPY_NR_RANGE, limits the number of entries for the IOCTL and > MAX_COPY_TOTAL_LENGTH limits the total copy length, IOCTL can handle. > > Example code, to issue BLKCOPY: > /* Sample example to copy three source-ranges [0, 8] [16, 8] [32,8] to > * [64,24], on the same device */ > > int main(void) > { > int ret, fd; > struct range_entry source_range[] = {{.src = 0, .len = 8}, > {.src = 16, .len = 8}, {.src = 32, .len = 8},}; > struct copy_range cr; > > cr.dest = 64; > cr.nr_range = 3; > cr.range_list = (__u64)&source_range; > > fd = open("/dev/nvme0n1", O_RDWR); > if (fd < 0) return 1; > > ret = ioctl(fd, BLKCOPY, &cr); > if (ret < 0) printf("copy failure\n"); > > close(fd); > > return ret; > } > > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty > Signed-off-by: SelvaKumar S > Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi > --- > block/ioctl.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c > index eb0491e90b9a..2af56d01e9fe 100644 > --- a/block/ioctl.c > +++ b/block/ioctl.c > @@ -143,6 +143,37 @@ static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, > GFP_KERNEL, flags); > } > > +static int blk_ioctl_copy(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, > + unsigned long arg) > +{ > + struct copy_range crange; > + struct range_entry *rlist; > + int ret; > + > + if (!(mode & FMODE_WRITE)) > + return -EBADF; > + > + if (copy_from_user(&crange, (void __user *)arg, sizeof(crange))) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + rlist = kmalloc_array(crange.nr_range, sizeof(*rlist), > + GFP_KERNEL); No error checking for huge values of nr_range? Is that wise? You really want userspace to be able to allocate "all" of the kernel memory in the system? thanks, greg k-h -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel