From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC2C433EF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2AD60FC0 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:48:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6B2AD60FC0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-594-4JH4RIArMTe6GW2Vl7eUSw-1; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:48:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4JH4RIArMTe6GW2Vl7eUSw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D25819251A6; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C946C6A257; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857901803B30; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 18F7ke9a009123 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:46:41 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 66C64218CC34; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast05.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60758218CC32 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9C86800C00 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-526-VpHfsP7QOjKkLmLiq5EJNQ-1; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:46:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VpHfsP7QOjKkLmLiq5EJNQ-1 Received: from hch by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mQPTH-00FSyn-VW; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:36:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:36:43 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Biggers Message-ID: References: <20210913013135.102404-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20210913013135.102404-2-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210913013135.102404-2-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Satya Tangirala , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/5] blk-crypto-fallback: properly prefix function and struct names X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 06:31:31PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and > structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback. Instead, use > "blk_crypto_fallback_". Some places already did this, but others > didn't. > > This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to > mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like). > Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot". > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers These names are pretty long, but given that there aren't all the many of them: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel