From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq/dm-rq: support BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING for dm-rq
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:26:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdyIZR4LkQTVjhWf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YcuB4K8P2d9WFb83@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 28 2021 at 4:30P -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22 2021 at 11:16P -0500,
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 08:21:39AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:14:56PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > dm-rq may be built on blk-mq device which marks BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING, so
> > > > dm_mq_queue_rq() may become to sleep current context.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes the issue by allowing dm-rq to set BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING in case that
> > > > any underlying queue is marked as BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING.
> > > >
> > > > DM request queue is allocated before allocating tagset, this way is a
> > > > bit special, so we need to pre-allocate srcu payload, then use the queue
> > > > flag of QUEUE_FLAG_BLOCKING for locking dispatch.
> > >
> > > What is the benefit over just forcing bio-based dm-mpath for these
> > > devices?
> >
> > At least IO scheduler can't be used for bio based dm-mpath, also there should
> > be other drawbacks for bio based mpath and request mpath is often the default
> > option, maybe Mike has more input about bio vs request dm-mpath.
>
> Yeah, people use request-based for IO scheduling and more capable path
> selectors. Imposing bio-based would be a pretty jarring workaround for
> BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING. request-based DM should properly support it.
>
> I'm on vacation for the next week but will have a look at this
> patchset once I'm back.
I replied last week and hoped Jens would pick this patchset up after
my Reviewed-by of patch 3/3.
Christoph wasn't back though, so best to kick this thread again.
Thoughts on this patchset?
Thanks,
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-21 14:14 [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq/dm-rq: support BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING for dm-rq Ming Lei
2021-12-21 14:14 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: split having srcu from queue blocking Ming Lei
2022-01-11 18:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2021-12-21 14:14 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: add blk_alloc_disk_srcu Ming Lei
2022-01-11 18:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2021-12-21 14:14 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] dm: mark dm queue as blocking if any underlying is blocking Ming Lei
2022-01-06 15:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-01-06 15:51 ` Ming Lei
2022-01-10 19:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-01-11 18:14 ` Jeff Moyer
2021-12-21 16:21 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq/dm-rq: support BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING for dm-rq Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-23 4:16 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-28 21:30 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-01-10 19:26 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2022-01-11 8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-11 16:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-01-17 8:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-11 18:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2022-01-17 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-19 21:03 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdyIZR4LkQTVjhWf@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox