From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/8] dm: always setup ->orig_bio in alloc_io
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 22:25:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YleGKbZiHeBIJidI@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yldsqh2YsclXYl3s@T590>
On Wed, Apr 13 2022 at 8:36P -0400,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:58:54PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > The bigger issue with this patch is that you've caused
> > dm_submit_bio_remap() to go back to accounting the entire original bio
> > before any split occurs. That is a problem because you'll end up
> > accounting that bio for every split, so in split heavy workloads the
> > IO accounting won't reflect when the IO is actually issued and we'll
> > regress back to having very inaccurate and incorrect IO accounting for
> > dm_submit_bio_remap() heavy targets (e.g. dm-crypt).
>
> Good catch, but we know the length of mapped part in original bio before
> calling __map_bio(), so io->sectors/io->offset_sector can be setup here,
> something like the following delta change should address it:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index db23efd6bbf6..06b554f3104b 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -1558,6 +1558,13 @@ static int __split_and_process_bio(struct clone_info *ci)
>
> len = min_t(sector_t, max_io_len(ti, ci->sector), ci->sector_count);
> clone = alloc_tio(ci, ti, 0, &len, GFP_NOIO);
> +
> + if (ci->sector_count > len) {
> + /* setup the mapped part for accounting */
> + dm_io_set_flag(ci->io, DM_IO_SPLITTED);
> + ci->io->sectors = len;
> + ci->io->sector_offset = bio_end_sector(ci->bio) - ci->sector;
> + }
> __map_bio(clone);
>
> ci->sector += len;
> @@ -1603,11 +1610,6 @@ static void dm_split_and_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
> if (error || !ci.sector_count)
> goto out;
>
> - /* setup the mapped part for accounting */
> - dm_io_set_flag(ci.io, DM_IO_SPLITTED);
> - ci.io->sectors = bio_sectors(bio) - ci.sector_count;
> - ci.io->sector_offset = bio_end_sector(bio) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> -
> bio_trim(bio, ci.io->sectors, ci.sector_count);
> trace_block_split(bio, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> bio_inc_remaining(bio);
>
> --
> Ming
>
Unfortunately we do need splitting after __map_bio() because a dm
target's ->map can use dm_accept_partial_bio() to further reduce a
bio's mapped part.
But I think dm_accept_partial_bio() could be trained to update
tio->io->sectors?
dm_accept_partial_bio() has been around for a long time, it keeps
growing BUG_ONs that are actually helpful to narrow its use to "normal
IO", so it should be OK.
Running 'make check' in a built cryptsetup source tree should be a
good test for DM target interface functionality.
But there aren't automated tests for IO accounting correctness yet.
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 8:56 [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/8] dm: io accounting & polling improvement Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/8] block: replace disk based account with bdev's Ming Lei
2022-04-16 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/8] dm: don't pass bio to __dm_start_io_acct and dm_end_io_acct Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/8] dm: pass 'dm_io' instance to dm_io_acct directly Ming Lei
2022-04-12 20:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-13 1:43 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 4/8] dm: switch to bdev based io accounting interface Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/8] dm: always setup ->orig_bio in alloc_io Ming Lei
2022-04-12 20:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-12 22:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-12 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-12 23:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-13 0:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-13 1:56 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-13 6:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-13 12:26 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-13 17:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-14 0:36 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-14 2:25 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2022-04-14 3:57 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-14 17:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-15 0:14 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-15 21:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-17 2:22 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 6/8] dm: don't grab target io reference in dm_zone_map_bio Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 7/8] dm: improve target io referencing Ming Lei
2022-04-12 8:56 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 8/8] dm: put all polled io into one single list Ming Lei
2022-04-12 17:15 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/8] dm: io accounting & polling improvement Mike Snitzer
2022-04-16 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-17 1:23 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YleGKbZiHeBIJidI@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox