dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: fail writes to read-only devices
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:13:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZH9bMx10optlZZlf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601072829.1258286-4-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Jun 01 2023 at  3:28P -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> Currently callers can happily submit writes to block devices that are
> marked read-only, including to drivers that don't even support writes
> and will crash when fed such bios.
> 
> While bio submitter should check for read-only devices, that's not a
> very robust way of dealing with this.
> 
> Note that the last attempt to do this got reverted by Linus in commit
> a32e236eb93e ("Partially revert "block: fail op_is_write() requests to
> read-only partitions") because device mapper relyied on not enforcing
> the read-only state when used together with older lvm-tools.
> 
> The lvm side got fixed in:
> 
>     https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commit;h=a6fdb9d9d70f51c49ad11a87ab4243344e6701a3
> 
> but if people still have older lvm2 tools in use we probably need
> to find a workaround for this in device mapper rather than lacking
> the core block layer checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  7:28 [dm-devel] enforce read-only state at the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: remove a duplicate bdev_read_only declaration Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: simplify the check for flushes in bio_check_ro Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: fail writes to read-only devices Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-02  1:02   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-02 15:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-02 15:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 16:13   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2023-06-06 16:11 ` [dm-devel] enforce read-only state at the block layer Mike Snitzer
2023-06-07  5:33   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZH9bMx10optlZZlf@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).