From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60EDC7EE31 for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:54:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1685480081; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=WTU2OkKH+vwakdSz/nVB1dmV4ey2d9p7fXjL2zD7WhA=; b=TjJyc5BOsINqL+tVFiErsatHw3kOwCjif/Fv1gPcHDPjh9tpajfDTLXa/tm2/95+bSU/4h Wg2dNNG4h7sRR79Psk7PtnJc9BtluYS8labHfK1rVH377gUHMRxqZ7Ppj4oXl2k22eoWnw yw2k78Aro1uqi4qcCein5Z7cmTk5xBA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-614-ttR1-bZcPRW5n_SSyk6lXw-1; Tue, 30 May 2023 16:54:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ttR1-bZcPRW5n_SSyk6lXw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F43803D45; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C95140CFD45; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F6519451DD; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0725F194658C for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 23:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id AA1D840CFD09; Mon, 29 May 2023 23:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D3940CFD08 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 23:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A686101A531 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 23:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out-2.mta1.migadu.com (out-2.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.2]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-241-LY6EXn3jMOOVqE7bM-Xd8w-1; Mon, 29 May 2023 19:59:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LY6EXn3jMOOVqE7bM-Xd8w-1 Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 19:51:21 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Kent Overstreet To: Dave Chinner Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 May 2023 20:54:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [dm-devel] fuzzing bcachefs with dm-flakey X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Mikulas Patocka , Matthew Wilcox Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "dm-devel" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: linux.dev Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:12:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Perhaps it is worthwhile running the same tests on btrfs so we can > something to compare the bcachefs behaviour to. I suspect that btrfs > will fair little better on the single device, no checksums > corruption test.... It's also a test we _should_ be doing much, much better on: we've got validation code for every key type that we run on every metadata read, so there's no excuses for thees bugs and they will be fixed. Just a question of when and in what order... -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel