From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B4C2820D1 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758567388; cv=none; b=pT/nIklu2BDw1Dh3ib4uo6U5j/Ga+nT1TL5/ZSAfUSG3mCrf9nkJs2XlAW9TMdw4omGwiqU/I80xpVkOrJz/0+mq2ExZEqjV6QHi86R+Hjeqm8UKhLlqlPEDpiFANpcH3P72RPRFiRAq215LE9XNHGfpo2rlsMNiGKf804SJquY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758567388; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fF49wtimi/ErdezXZ2u13sEMtrtfomj3Nxk3CxTe39w=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=GBu5AeOPnFQ9wddFV9k9cuoGahmA+eB0FJQiWeAtn2LcJ2oRfseJMR35denlC4hQCKw2KgeX5764l0mB8NHoyVRnq3V5LgbKa6Gc8r9Z/RNaM8zIPre1Vl+jv/1iFbgjGS2DQe+Na6y13NBmT3agCGKWW64vuaUhm3cCdc0EX1E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=Gn20Oq8H; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=GMR5+dnV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Gn20Oq8H"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="GMR5+dnV" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F0C1F845; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:56:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1758567384; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fF49wtimi/ErdezXZ2u13sEMtrtfomj3Nxk3CxTe39w=; b=Gn20Oq8HMwS9qXro5LHGuFkdoUzeKQ1ufBKH75EO7rsGo7ou1wTIRub1zmnYZiOIWnKn6v DnhrzEtqWVW5rnW9RLw34w3goJqT4+eLtf62p+m1WEnxVANKS/EVkUiU+quDVK6u84Pc+K SmZjDIsBB+w5gpI7iG/MRX3GieYuuAw= Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=GMR5+dnV DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1758567383; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fF49wtimi/ErdezXZ2u13sEMtrtfomj3Nxk3CxTe39w=; b=GMR5+dnVp8dTU+9V1CL3MbK4wo+tshMDWwddDIvhVTLX1xZKnYa236w75IyeoBwzm5Zajf acQKgVn9AvZJV53z3XB/i0BYrAji4C5M2FZnNYKjNoUWkRAQ9mt2hKd+BIJwO7CNI4T9HO TSpKlr3RZP9gMSjA/+Y4ZfyecybGLIU= Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A44161388C; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Rby0Jteb0WjdYQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:56:23 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] multipath-tools: add new NVMe devices to hwtable From: Martin Wilck To: Xose Vazquez Perez , Benjamin Marzinski Cc: Steven Schremmer , NetApp RDAC team , Benjamin Marzinski , Christophe Varoqui , DM_DEVEL-ML Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 20:56:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20250913130221.35073-1-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> References: <20250913130221.35073-1-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.com:s=susede1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.com:s=susede1]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,redhat.com]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.com:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.com:mid,suse.com:dkim,suse.com:email] X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Level: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D5F0C1F845 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Score: -3.01 On Sat, 2025-09-13 at 15:02 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Even if they work with the generic NVME config. It is convenient to > have > them as an independent config to tweak their options, compare dm- > multipath > against the NVMe subsystem, .. >=20 > Only two of them are missing ("Fujitsu ETERNUS AB/HB Series" and > "NetApp E-Series") > as requested by its vendor: https://marc.info/?t=3D165256933900004 >=20 > Xose Vazquez Perez (4): > =C2=A0multipath-tools: remove checker from Huawei OceanStor NVMe > =C2=A0multipath-tools: add HITACHI VSP NVMe to hwtable > =C2=A0multipath-tools: add Infinidat InfiniBox NVMe to hwtable > =C2=A0multipath-tools: add VASTData Block Subsystem NVMe to hwtable >=20 > =C2=A0libmultipath/hwtable.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > =C2=A01 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > Cc: Steven Schremmer > Cc: NetApp RDAC team > Cc: Martin Wilck > Cc: Benjamin Marzinski > Cc: Christophe Varoqui > Cc: DM_DEVEL-ML > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez For the series: Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck I realize you set .no_path_retry =3D NO_PATH_RETRY_QUEUE for all devices. Should we use this for the generic NVMe device, too? Martin