From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, DMML <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] dm-ebs: Mark full buffer dirty even on partial write
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:57:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR2GjRaNWrfHbDGQ@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119085328.GA24461@lst.de>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:43:13AM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > Well. LBA is fixed in my case. Just only one format which is 512B.
> >
> > Whereas the I/O can not be performed by using LBAs sizes. It is fixed
> > and bigger.
>
> Then it is not an LBA. The LBA is defined as the minimum block size
> you can do I/O on. Aka your device is really gravely broken. What
> device is this and who is selling it?
>
I define UBS - underlying block size. The lower layer expects BIOs in
that sizes but this is not true.
I am not allowed to disclose and answer your last question.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 10:59 [RESEND PATCH] dm-ebs: Mark full buffer dirty even on partial write Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-11-17 20:48 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-18 11:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-18 12:00 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-18 12:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-18 12:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-18 14:15 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-11-18 17:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-19 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 8:43 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-19 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 8:57 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-11-19 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 9:01 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-19 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 9:13 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-19 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 17:26 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-20 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-20 12:08 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-20 12:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-21 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-21 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-21 13:21 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-21 16:48 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-11-24 10:43 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-24 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 15:30 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-24 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 18:05 ` Uladzislau Rezki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-14 14:47 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-16 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-17 15:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aR2GjRaNWrfHbDGQ@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).