public inbox for dm-devel@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] multipath-tools: more small fixes
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:56:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWaxif6-mcbwq88d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109183907.201250-1-mwilck@suse.com>

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 07:38:58PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> 1 and 2 are minor cleanups. 
> 
> Patch 3-5 are follow-ups of the structure-freeing cleanup of my
> previous patch series "Multipath-tools: various bug fixes".
> The previous series tried to make sure that no freed "struct multipath"
> objects are ever referenced by any "struct path" objects. To achieve
> that, it nullified pp->mpp links from all paths in a struct multipath
> when the latter was discarded in free_multipath(). This is only safe
> if we make sure that the path referenced by a struct multipath (either
> via mpp->paths or mpp->pg[i]->paths for some i), aren't freed before
> the struct multipath itself. Ideally, the orphaning in free_multipath()
> wouldn't need to happen if we'd make sure that pp->mpp is set *if and
> only if* pp was referenced by mpp as explained above. I think we do
> a decent job at that, but it's hard to tell with 100% confidence.
> 
> In order to improve confidence, patch 4 and 5 add some logging. It's now an
> error if a path which is freed still links to a multipath map. Patch 3/5
> eliminates a few cases where this could still happen, even though the path was
> not member of the map. Patch 5 is mainly meant to debug cases pp->mpp was
> either NULL or pointing to a different map. This shouldn't happen and I
> haven't observed it in my testing so far.
> 
> Patch 6 avoids a strange behavior that multipathd has had forever - after
> grouping paths, mpp->paths was freed. In most of our code, we assume that
> mpp->paths and mpp->pg should reference the same set of path devices, and
> we have update_mpp_paths() and sync_paths() to take care of it. But right
> after path grouping, this is not the case. Subsequent invocations of
> update_mpp_path() (usually via refresh_multipath()) will re-allocate and
> fill the paths vector. This causes a lot of unnecessary heap operations.
> 
> Patch 7 and 8 are unrelated bug fixes which I came across lately.
> 
> Patch 9 is motivated by the recent patch "libmpathutil: use union for bitfield".
> I did some further experiments with strict aliasing and found that the
> multipath-tools code base just should not use it at all. Like the kernel,
> we use between low-level data structures that don't comply with strict
> aliasing rules. So like the kernel, we should disable strict aliasing.
> That basically obsoletes "libmpathutil: use union for bitfield", but having
> it doesn't hurt, either.
> 
> Interestingly, switching to -fno-strict-aliasing seems to have fixed [1],
> which I'd unsuccessfully tried to fix with various methods before.

For the set:
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>

> 
> [1] https://github.com/opensvc/multipath-tools/issues/130
> 
> Martin Wilck (9):
>   libmultipath: reset pgindex in uninitialize_path()
>   libmultipath: clarify code in set_path_removed()
>   libmultipath: nullify pp->mpp before calling free_path()
>   libmultipath: log error when freeing path that refers to a map
>   libmultipath: sync_paths(): print message when fixing pp->mpp
>   libmultipath: don't free mpp->paths in group_paths()
>   libmultipath: warn only once in scsi_tmo_error_msg()
>   libmultipath: find_hwe(): fix gcc errors at high optimization levels
>   multipath-tools: compile with -fno-strict-aliasing
> 
>  Makefile.inc               |  2 +-
>  libmultipath/config.c      | 13 ++++++++++---
>  libmultipath/discovery.c   |  3 +++
>  libmultipath/pgpolicies.c  |  2 --
>  libmultipath/structs.c     |  4 ++++
>  libmultipath/structs_vec.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>  tests/pgpolicy.c           |  7 +++++--
>  7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.52.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-13 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09 18:38 [PATCH 0/9] multipath-tools: more small fixes Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] libmultipath: reset pgindex in uninitialize_path() Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] libmultipath: clarify code in set_path_removed() Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] libmultipath: nullify pp->mpp before calling free_path() Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] libmultipath: log error when freeing path that refers to a map Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] libmultipath: sync_paths(): print message when fixing pp->mpp Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] libmultipath: don't free mpp->paths in group_paths() Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] libmultipath: warn only once in scsi_tmo_error_msg() Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] libmultipath: find_hwe(): fix gcc errors at high optimization levels Martin Wilck
2026-01-09 18:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] multipath-tools: compile with -fno-strict-aliasing Martin Wilck
2026-01-13 20:56 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWaxif6-mcbwq88d@redhat.com \
    --to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.wilck@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox