From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matias Bjorling <Matias.Bjorling@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 20:34:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af21e631-78bc-71f3-60a9-d021f074dab8@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0401MB16409A77BC3EA6E37073DD17E7FD0@BN3PR0401MB1640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 10/14/18 6:45 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Jens,
>
> On 2018/10/14 7:43, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/12/18 4:08 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> This series improves zoned block device support (reduce overhead) and
>>> introduces many simplifications to the code (overall, there are more deletions
>>> than insertions).
>>>
>>> In more details:
>>> * Patches 1 to 3 are SCSI side (sd driver) cleanups and improvements reducing
>>> the overhead of report zones command execution during disk scan and
>>> revalidation.
>>> * Patches 4 to 9 improve the useability and user API of zoned block devices.
>>> * Patch 10 is the main part of this series. This patch replaces the
>>> REQ_OP_ZONE_REPORT BIO/request operation for executing report zones commands
>>> with a block device file operation, removing the need for the command reply
>>> payload in-place rewriting in the BIO buffer. This leads to major
>>> simplification of the code in many places.
>>> * Patch 11 further simplifies the code of low level drivers by providing a
>>> generic implementation of zoned block device request queue zone bitmaps
>>> initialization and revalidation.
>>>
>>> Please consider the addition of these patches in 4.20.
>>> Comments are as always welcome.
>>
>> How do we want to funnel this series? 1-3 look separate, so perhaps
>> they should go through the scsi tree. Then I can take the rest. Or do
>> some of the later ones depend on 1-3 being in, in terms of applying
>> cleanly? I can also take all of them, looks like only #3 needs a
>> SCSI ack.
>
> Patch 10 and 11 will not apply cleanly for the scsi part without 1-3
> in first. 1-3, 10 and 11 would need an ack/review from Martin (SCSI).
> And 10-11 also probably need an ack/review from Mike for the DM
> changes.
Probably want to start pinging people, if you're targeting 4.20 with
this...
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-16 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Rearrange code Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16 4:48 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Reduce boot device scan and revalidate time Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16 4:50 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix sd_zbc_check_zones() error checks Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-10-12 11:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16 4:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-17 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] block: Introduce blkdev_nr_zones() helper Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block: Limit allocation of zone descriptors for report zones Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] block: Introduce BLKGETZONESZ ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] block: Introduce BLKGETNRZONES ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: Improve zone reset execution Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] block: Expose queue nr_zones in sysfs Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: add a report_zones method Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16 4:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 15:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] block: Introduce blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16 5:00 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 15:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-13 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Jens Axboe
2018-10-15 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16 2:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-10-16 3:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-18 7:57 ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-23 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-24 2:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 15:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-24 15:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 16:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-25 14:30 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-24 8:04 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af21e631-78bc-71f3-60a9-d021f074dab8@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=Matias.Bjorling@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox