From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Maier Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without request batching Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:09:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190807144948.28265-1-maier@linux.ibm.com> <20190807144948.28265-2-maier@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: "Martin K. Petersen" , Ming Lei , Paolo Bonzini , Mark Brown Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-s390 , Benjamin Block , Vasily Gorbik , Linux SCSI List , "James E . J . Bottomley" , Heiko Carstens , Hannes Reinecke , "Ewan D . Milne" , Ming Lei , linux-block , "open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" , Linux-Next Mailing List , Mike Snitzer , Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 8/8/19 4:18 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Ming, > >>> + .cleanup_rq = scsi_cleanup_rq, >>> .busy = scsi_mq_lld_busy, >>> .map_queues = scsi_map_queues, >>> }; >> >> This one is a cross-tree thing, either scsi/5.4/scsi-queue needs to >> pull for-5.4/block, or do it after both land linus tree. > > I'll set up an amalgamated for-next branch tomorrow. Martin, is it possible that you re-wrote your for-next and it now no longer contains a merged 5.4/scsi-postmerge with those fixes? At least I cannot find the fix code in next-20190917 and it fails again for me. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards Steffen Maier Linux on IBM Z Development https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/ IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294