From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: xfstests generic/347 seems unhappy on todays block for-next tree Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:09:51 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20181210213724.GA27905@infradead.org> <20181210215356.GA20174@infradead.org> <695940bb-3783-c8f6-6747-dfd548df7ca7@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <695940bb-3783-c8f6-6747-dfd548df7ca7@kernel.dk> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 12/10/18 3:00 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/10/18 2:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:39:39PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 12/10/18 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> This test is described as: >>>> >>>> # Test very basic thin device usage, exhaustion, and growth >>> >>> Does that tree have: >>> >>> commit c616cbee97aed4bc6178f148a7240206dcdb85a6 >>> Author: Jens Axboe >>> Date: Thu Dec 6 22:17:44 2018 -0700 >>> >>> blk-mq: punt failed direct issue to dispatch list >>> >>> ? >> >> yes. >> >> The latest commit is 6f75723190d88e1319bea623bfe0292bf3917965 > > Reproduces here, guessing it's the inflight counters... Trying without. Yep, works without the inflight changes. Deferring to Mike to sort this one out. -- Jens Axboe