From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without request batching Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:22:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190807144948.28265-1-maier@linux.ibm.com> <20190807144948.28265-2-maier@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Steffen Maier's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:09:50 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Steffen Maier Cc: Vasily Gorbik , linux-s390 , Benjamin Block , Linux SCSI List , "Martin K. Petersen" , Ming Lei , "James E . J . Bottomley" , Heiko Carstens , Hannes Reinecke , "Ewan D . Milne" , Ming Lei , linux-block , "open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" , Mark Brown , Mike Snitzer , Linux-Next Mailing List , Paolo Bonzini , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche List-Id: dm-devel.ids Steffen, > Martin, is it possible that you re-wrote your for-next and it now no > longer contains a merged 5.4/scsi-postmerge with those fixes? At > least I cannot find the fix code in next-20190917 and it fails again > for me. Yes, looks like you're right. Not sure how I managed to mess that up. I must have inadvertently done a reset in the wrong worktree because my for-next branch maintenance script only does merges. In any case, since Linus has pulled the block tree dependencies, I'll rebase the postmerge branch on top of current linus/master and create a new for-next. Thanks for the heads-up! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering