From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>, <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: Simplify dma_async_device_register()
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:04:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b821549-cf4a-7de3-9eb7-aee4eacc3185@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815072346.2798927-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
On 8/15/23 00:23, Yajun Deng wrote:
> There are a lot of duplicate codes for checking if the dma has some
> capability.
>
> Define a temporary macro that is used to check if the dma claims some
> capability and if the corresponding function is implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 82 ++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 826b98284fa1..b7388ae62d7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -1147,69 +1147,27 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
>
> device->owner = device->dev->driver->owner;
>
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_MEMCPY, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_memcpy) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_MEMCPY");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_XOR, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_xor) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_XOR");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_XOR_VAL, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_xor_val) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_XOR_VAL");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_pq) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_PQ");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ_VAL, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_pq_val) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_PQ_VAL");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_MEMSET, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_memset) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_MEMSET");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERRUPT, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_interrupt) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_INTERRUPT");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_CYCLIC, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_dma_cyclic) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_CYCLIC");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_interleaved_dma) {
> - dev_err(device->dev,
> - "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n",
> - "DMA_INTERLEAVE");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> +#define CHECK_CAP(_name, _type) \
> +{ \
> + if (dma_has_cap(_type, device->cap_mask) && !device->device_prep_##_name) { \
> + dev_err(device->dev, \
> + "Device claims capability %s, but op is not defined\n", \
> + __stringify(_type)); \
> + return -EIO; \
> + } \
> +}
>
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_memcpy, DMA_MEMCPY);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_xor, DMA_XOR);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_xor_val, DMA_XOR_VAL);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_pq, DMA_PQ);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_pq_val, DMA_PQ_VAL);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_memset, DMA_MEMSET);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_interrupt, DMA_INTERRUPT);
> + CHECK_CAP(dma_cyclic, DMA_CYCLIC);
> + CHECK_CAP(interleaved_dma, DMA_INTERLEAVE);
> +
> +#undef CHECK_CAP
>
> if (!device->device_tx_status) {
> dev_err(device->dev, "Device tx_status is not defined\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-15 7:23 [PATCH] dmaengine: Simplify dma_async_device_register() Yajun Deng
2023-08-15 16:04 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2023-08-21 13:52 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b821549-cf4a-7de3-9eb7-aee4eacc3185@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox