From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: radheys@xilinx.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, lars@metafoo.de,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
appanad@xilinx.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] dmaengine: Add metadat_ops for dma_async_tx_descriptor
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:52:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719092224.GK3219@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
Hi Peter,
On 18-07-18, 13:06, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> +struct dma_async_tx_descriptor;
> >> +
> >> +struct dma_descriptor_metadata_ops {
> >> + int (*attach)(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, void *data,
> >> + size_t len);
> >
> > How does one detach?
>
> I have not thought about detach, but clients can just attach NULL I guess.
So what are the implication of attach and detach here, should the data
be deref by dmaengine driver and drop the ref.
Should anyone do refcounting?
>
> > When should the client free up the memory, IOW when
> > does dma driver drop ref to data.
>
> The metadata is for the descriptor so the DMA driver might want to
> access to it while the descriptor is valid.
>
> Typically clients can free up their metadata storage after the dma
> completion callback. On DEV_TO_MEM the metadata is going to be placed in
> the provided buffer when the transfer is completed.
That sounds okay to me
> >> + void *(*get_ptr)(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc,
> >> + size_t *payload_len, size_t *max_len);
> >
> > so what is this supposed to do..?
>
> My issue with the attach in general is that it will need additional
> memcpy to move the metadata from/to the client buffer to it's place.
>
> With get_ptr the client can get the pointer to the actual place where
> the metadata resides and modify/read it in place w/o memcpy.
>
> I know, I know... We need to trust the clients, but with high throughput
> peripherals the memcpy is taxing.
Okay I am not sure I have understood fully, so with attach you set
a pointer (containing metdata?) so why do you need additional one..
>
> >
> >> + int (*set_len)(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc,
> >> + size_t payload_len);
> >
> > attach already has length, so how does this help?
>
> So, DMA drivers can implement either or both:
> 1. attach()
> 2. get_ptr() / set_len()
Ah okay, what are the reasons for providing two methods and not a single
one
>
> Clients must not mix the two way of handling the metadata.
> The set_len() is intended to tell the DMA driver the client provided
> metadata size (in MEM_TO_DEV case mostly).
>
> MEM_TO_DEV flow on client side:
> get_ptr()
> fill in the metadata to the pointer (not exceeding max_len)
> set_len() to tell the DMA driver the amount of valid bytes written
>
> DEV_TO_MEM flow on client side:
> In the completion callback, get_ptr()
> the metadata is payload_len bytes and can be accessed in the return pointer.
I would think to unify this..
> BTW: The driver which is going to need this is now accessible in public:
> https://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/trees/ti-linux-4.14.y/drivers/dma/ti
>
> or in my wip tree:
> https://github.com/omap-audio/linux-audio/tree/peter/ti-linux-4.14.y/wip/drivers/dma/ti
>
> prefixed with k3-*
>
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-19 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 9:22 Vinod Koul [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-31 4:29 [RFC] dmaengine: Add metadat_ops for dma_async_tx_descriptor Vinod Koul
2018-07-30 9:46 Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-24 11:14 Vinod Koul
2018-07-20 13:42 Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-18 10:06 Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-10 5:52 Vinod Koul
2018-07-02 6:59 Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-06-01 10:24 Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180719092224.GK3219@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=appanad@xilinx.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=radheys@xilinx.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox