From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, tiwai@suse.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sharadg@nvidia.com, rlokhande@nvidia.com, dramesh@nvidia.com,
mkumard@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] dmaengine: add fifo_size member
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:03:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190618043308.GJ2962@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09929edf-ddec-b70e-965e-cbc9ba4ffe6a@nvidia.com>
On 17-06-19, 12:37, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>
> On 6/13/2019 10:13 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 06-06-19, 09:19, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> >
> > > > you are really going other way around about the whole picture. FWIW that
> > > > is how *other* folks do audio with dmaengine!
> > > I discussed this internally with HW folks and below is the reason why DMA
> > > needs
> > > to know FIFO size.
> > >
> > > - FIFOs reside in peripheral device(ADMAIF), which is the ADMA interface to
> > > the audio sub-system.
> > > - ADMAIF has multiple channels and share FIFO buffer for individual
> > > operations. There is a provision
> > > to allocate specific fifo size for each individual ADMAIF channel from the
> > > shared buffer.
> > > - Tegra Audio DMA(ADMA) architecture is different from the usual DMA
> > > engines, which you described earlier.
> > > - The flow control logic is placed inside ADMA. Slave peripheral
> > > device(ADMAIF) signals ADMA whenever a
> > > read or write happens on the FIFO(per WORD basis). Please note that the
> > > signaling is per channel. There is
> > > no other signaling present from ADMAIF to ADMA.
> > > - ADMA keeps a counter related to above signaling. Whenever a sufficient
> > when is signal triggered? When there is space available or some
> > threshold of space is reached?
> Signal is triggered when FIFO read/write happens on the peripheral side. In
> other words
> this happens when data is pushed/popped out of ADMAIF from/to one of the
> AHUB modules (I2S
> for example) This is on peripheral side and ADMAIF signals ADMA per WORD
> basis.
> ADMA <---(1. DMA transfers)---> ADMAIF <------ (2. FIFO read/write) ------>
> I2S
> To be more clear ADMAIF signals ADMA when [2] happens.
That is on every word read/write?
> FIFO_THRESHOLD field in ADMAIF is just to indicate when can ADMAIF do
> operation [2].
> Also please note FIFO_THRESHOLD field is present only for memory---->AHUB
> path (playback path)
> and there is no such threshold concept for AHUB----> memory path (capture
> path)
That is sane and common. For memory you dont have a constraint so you
transfer at full throttle.
> > > space is available, it initiates a transfer.
> > > But the question is, how does it know when to transfer. This is the
> > > reason, why ADMA has to be aware of FIFO
> > > depth of ADMAIF channel. Depending on the counters and FIFO depth, it
> > > knows exactly when a free space is available
> > > in the context of a specific channel. On ADMA, FIFO_SIZE is just a value
> > > which should match to actual FIFO_DEPTH/SIZE
> > > of ADMAIF channel.
> > That doesn't sound too different from typical dmaengine. To give an
> > example of a platform (and general DMAengine principles as well) I worked
> > on the FIFO was 16 word deep. DMA didn't knew!
> >
> > Peripheral driver would signal to DMA when a threshold is reached and
> No, In our case ADMAIF does not do any threshold based signalling to ADMA.
> > DMA would send a burst controlled by src/dst_burst_size. For example if
> > you have a FIFO with 16 words depth, typical burst_size would be 8 words
> > and peripheral will configure signalling for FIFO having 8 words, so
> > signal from peripheral will make dma transfer 8 words.
> The scenario is different in ADMA case, as ADMAIF cannot configure the
> signalling based on FIFO_THRESHOLD settings.
> >
> > Here the peripheral driver FIFO is important, but the driver
> > configures it and sets burst_size accordingly.
> >
> > So can you explain me what is the difference here that the peripheral
> > cannot configure and use burst size with passing fifo depth?
> Say for example FIFO_THRESHOLD is programmed as 16 WORDS, BURST_SIZE as 8
> WORDS.
> ADMAIF does not push data to AHUB(operation [2]) till threshold of 16 WORDS
> is
> reached in ADMAIF FIFO. Hence 2 burst transfers are needed to reach the
> threshold.
> As mentioned earlier, threshold here is to just indicate when data transfer
> can happen
> to AHUB modules.
So we have ADMA and AHUB and peripheral. You are talking to AHUB and that
is _not_ peripheral and if I have guess right the fifo depth is for AHUB
right?
> Once the data is popped from ADMAIF FIFO, ADMAIF signals ADMA. ADMA is the
> master
> and it keeps track of the buffer occupancy by knowing the FIFO_DEPTH and the
> signalling.
> Then finally it decides when to do next burst transfer depending on the free
> space
> available in ADMAIF.
> > > - Now consider two cases based on above logic,
> > > * Case 1: when DMA_FIFO_SIZE > SLAVE_FIFO_SIZE
> > > In this case, ADMA thinks that there is enough space available for
> > > transfer, when actually the FIFO data
> > > on slave is not consumed yet. It would result in OVERRUN.
> > > * Case 2: when DMA_FIFO_SIZE < SLAVE_FIFO_SIZE
> > > This is case where ADMA won’t transfer, even though sufficient space is
> > > available, resulting in UNDERRUN.
> > > - The guideline is to program, DMA_FIFO_SIZE(on ADMA side) =
> > > SLAVE_FIFO_SIZE(on ADMAIF side) and hence we need a
> > > way to communicate fifo size info to ADMA.
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 11:30 [RFC] dmaengine: add fifo_size member Sameer Pujar
2019-04-30 11:30 ` [PATCH] " Sameer Pujar
2019-05-02 6:04 ` Vinod Koul
2019-05-02 6:04 ` [PATCH] " Vinod Koul
2019-05-02 10:53 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-05-02 12:25 ` Vinod Koul
2019-05-02 13:29 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-05-03 19:10 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-05-04 10:23 ` Vinod Koul
2019-05-06 13:04 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-05-06 15:50 ` Vinod Koul
2019-06-06 3:49 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-06-06 6:00 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-06-06 6:41 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-06-06 7:14 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 10:22 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-06-06 10:49 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 11:54 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-06-06 12:37 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 13:45 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-06 13:55 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-06 14:26 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 14:36 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 14:36 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-06 14:47 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 14:25 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 15:18 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-06 16:32 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 16:44 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-06 16:53 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-06 17:25 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-06 17:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-07 9:24 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-07 5:50 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-06-07 9:18 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-07 10:27 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-07 12:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-06-07 12:58 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-07 13:35 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-06-07 20:53 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-10 8:01 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-10 7:59 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-13 4:43 ` Vinod Koul
2019-06-17 7:07 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-06-18 4:33 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2019-06-20 10:29 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-06-24 6:26 ` Vinod Koul
2019-06-25 2:57 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-07-05 6:15 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-07-15 15:42 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-07-19 5:04 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-23 5:54 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-07-29 6:10 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-31 9:48 ` Jon Hunter
2019-07-31 15:16 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-02 8:51 ` Jon Hunter
2019-08-08 12:38 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-19 15:56 ` Jon Hunter
2019-08-20 11:05 ` Vinod Koul
2019-09-16 9:02 ` Sameer Pujar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190618043308.GJ2962@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dramesh@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=rlokhande@nvidia.com \
--cc=sharadg@nvidia.com \
--cc=spujar@nvidia.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox