From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan()
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:51:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204062118.GS2841@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vf__isc59YBS9=O+9ApSV62XuZ2nBAWKKD_K7i72P-yFg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03-02-20, 12:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
>
> > dma_request_slave_channel_reason() no longer have user in mainline, it
> > can be removed.
> >
> > Advise users of dma_request_slave_channel() and
> > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() to move to dma_request_slave_chan()
>
> How? There are legacy ARM boards you have to care / remove before.
> DMAengine subsystem makes a p*s off decisions without taking care of
> (I'm talking now about dma release callback, for example) end users.
Can you elaborate issue you are seeing with dma_release callback?
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 10:18 [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan() Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-03 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: Remove unused define for dma_request_slave_channel_reason() Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-03 10:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: Mark dma_request_slave_channel() deprecated Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-03 10:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: Encourage dma_request_slave_channel_compat() users to migrate Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-03 10:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-03 10:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan() Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-03 10:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-03 11:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-03 12:09 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-03 12:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-03 13:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-03 20:21 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-02-03 20:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-03 21:26 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-02-04 8:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-04 6:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-04 8:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-04 8:15 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-04 8:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-04 9:16 ` Rob Landley
2020-02-04 9:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-04 10:18 ` Rob Landley
2020-02-04 6:21 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2020-02-04 11:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-05 4:43 ` Vinod Koul
2020-02-05 8:10 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-05 11:31 ` Vinod Koul
2020-02-05 11:56 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-02-05 11:59 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200204062118.GS2841@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox