From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] dmaengine: dw: Introduce non-mem peripherals optimizations
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:58:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817062847.GM2639@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200731200826.9292-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
On 31-07-20, 23:08, Serge Semin wrote:
> After a lot of tests and thorough DW DMAC databook studying we've
> discovered that the driver can be optimized especially when it comes to
> working with non-memory peripherals.
>
> First of all we've found out that since each DW DMAC channel can
> be synthesized with different parameters, then even when two of them
> are configured to perform the same DMA transactions they may execute them
> with different performance. Since some DMA client devices might be
> sensitive to such important parameter as performance, then it is a good
> idea to let them request only suitable DMA channels. In this patchset we
> introduce a functionality, which makes it possible by passing the DMA
> channels mask either over the "dmas" DT property or in the dw_dma_slave
> platform data descriptor.
>
> Secondly FIFO-mode of the "FIFO readiness" criterion is more suitable for
> the pure memory DMA transfers, since it minimizes the system bus
> utilization, but causes some performance drop. When it comes to working with
> non-memory peripherals the DMA engine performance comes to the first
> place. Since normally DMA client devices keep data in internal FIFOs, any
> latency at some critical moment may cause a FIFO being overflown and
> consequently losing data. So in order to minimize a chance of the DW DMAC
> internal FIFO being a bottle neck during the DMA transfers to and from
> non-memory peripherals we propose not to use FIFO-mode for them.
>
> Thirdly it has been discovered that using a DMA transaction length is
> redundant when calculating the destination transfer width for the
> dev-to-mem DMA communications. That shall increase performance of the DMA
> transfers with unaligned data length.
>
> Finally there is a small optimization in the burst length setting. In
> particular we've found out, that according to the DW DMAC databoot it's
> pointless to set one for the memory peripherals since they don't have
> handshaking interface connected to the DMA controller. So we suggest to
> just ignore the burst length config when it comes to setting the memory
> peripherals up.
Applied all, thanks
--
~Vinod
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-31 20:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] dmaengine: dw: Introduce non-mem peripherals optimizations Serge Semin
2020-07-31 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: dma: dw: Add optional DMA-channels mask cell support Serge Semin
2020-08-03 21:51 ` Rob Herring
2020-08-17 10:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-19 14:02 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-31 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dmaengine: dw: Activate FIFO-mode for memory peripherals only Serge Semin
2020-07-31 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dmaengine: dw: Discard dlen from the dev-to-mem xfer width calculation Serge Semin
2020-07-31 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] dmaengine: dw: Ignore burst setting for memory peripherals Serge Semin
2020-07-31 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] dmaengine: dw: Add DMA-channels mask cell support Serge Semin
2020-08-17 6:28 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200817062847.GM2639@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox