dmaengine.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"vkoul@kernel.org" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@intel.com>,
	jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] iommu: Support allocation of global PASIDs outside SVA
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:07:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417090706.3ac5f858@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276D09F18BA65AD074777948C9A9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Kevin,

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:02:55 +0000, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
wrote:

> > From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2023 2:06 AM
> > @@ -28,8 +26,8 @@ static int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct
> > *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t ma
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (ret < min)
> > +	ret = iommu_alloc_global_pasid(min, max);  
> 
> I wonder whether this can take a device pointer so dev->iommu->max_pasids
> is enforced inside the alloc function.
> 
> and do we even need the min/max parameters? With special pasids reserved
> then what driver needs is just to get a free pasid from the global space
> within dev->iommu->max_pasids constraint...
> 
> iommu_sva_alloc_pasid() can be reworked to avoid min/max by taking a 
> device pointer too.
I think that will work too albeit a philosophical change. It probably
should be called iommu_alloc_dev_global_pasid(dev).

But I feel the current approach is more flexible in that device drivers
can control the range if for some reason it does not want go max_pasid.


Thanks,

Jacob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-07 18:05 [PATCH v4 0/7] Re-enable IDXD kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Use non-privileged mode for all PASIDs Jacob Pan
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove PASID supervisor request support Jacob Pan
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iommu: Support allocation of global PASIDs outside SVA Jacob Pan
2023-04-10  1:34   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-11  8:02   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-04-12  1:37     ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-17 16:46       ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-18  2:06         ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-18 23:04           ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-19  2:40             ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-19 21:05               ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-17 16:07     ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Reserve RID_PASID from global PASID space Jacob Pan
2023-04-10  1:59   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-17 16:36     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Make device pasid attachment explicit Jacob Pan
2023-04-10  2:46   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-10  3:14     ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-18 21:32     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-19  2:26       ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev_pasid domain op Jacob Pan
2023-04-07 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] dmaengine/idxd: Re-enable kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230417090706.3ac5f858@jacob-builder \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).