From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 00:31:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521003159.A88F11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520-dma_prep_config-v6-4-06e49b7acb38@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The newly added `dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg` callback modifies shared channel state locklessly, violating dmaengine API atomicity guarantees and potentially corrupting active hardware transfers.
--
commit 3f734236aec2497e34a2baf98f60bcd0cd1c6525
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback
This commit replaces the device_prep_slave_sg callback with the new
device_prep_config_sg callback to combine configuration and descriptor
preparation.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index c2feb3adc79fa..92572dd8131e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -577,10 +577,11 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> }
>
> static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> -dw_edma_device_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> - unsigned int len,
> - enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> - unsigned long flags, void *context)
> +dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> + unsigned int len,
> + enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> + unsigned long flags,
> + struct dma_slave_config *config)
> {
> struct dw_edma_transfer xfer;
>
> @@ -591,6 +592,9 @@ dw_edma_device_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> xfer.flags = flags;
> xfer.type = EDMA_XFER_SCATTER_GATHER;
>
> + if (config && dw_edma_device_config(dchan, config))
> + return NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a data race on the shared channel state?
By implementing the device_prep_config_sg callback, the driver bypasses
the dmaengine core's per-channel spinlock, which normally protects
configuration and preparation.
However, dw_edma_device_config() modifies global channel state locklessly:
static int dw_edma_device_config(...)
{
...
chan->non_ll = false;
...
if (cfg_non_ll || non_ll)
chan->non_ll = true;
...
memcpy(&chan->config, config, sizeof(*config));
...
}
If multiple threads queue transfers concurrently, could this corrupt the
descriptor configuration?
More importantly, if a new transfer is prepared while the channel is actively
executing, the interrupt handler might read the momentarily cleared or
overwritten chan->non_ll.
Could this cause the interrupt handler to invoke the wrong hardware routine
and desynchronize the hardware state?
> +
> return dw_edma_device_transfer(&xfer);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260520-dma_prep_config-v6-0-06e49b7acb38@nxp.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 22:00 [PATCH v6 0/9] dmaengine: Add new API to combine configuration and descriptor preparation Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] dmaengine: Add safe API to combine configuration and preparation Frank.Li
2026-05-21 0:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 14:56 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank.Li
2026-05-21 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-21 14:59 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank.Li
2026-05-21 0:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:02 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank.Li
2026-05-21 1:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:08 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank.Li
2026-05-21 2:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:09 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_sg() API Frank.Li
2026-05-21 2:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:11 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521003159.A88F11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox