From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 18:10:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521181014.C4DCE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521-dma_prep_config-v7-5-1f73f4899883@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch claims to support atomic configuration but continues to locklessly mutate and read global channel state, causing data races and broken atomicity.
--
commit e550cfd0855adb0abdce8c07ba7dc3b15ac63f86
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer()
This commit updates dw_edma_device_transfer() to take a dma_slave_config
argument. It intends to support atomic configuration and descriptor
preparation when a non-NULL config is provided to device_prep_config_sg().
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -595,7 +610,7 @@ dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> if (config && dw_edma_device_config(dchan, config))
> return NULL;
>
> - return dw_edma_device_transfer(&xfer);
> + return dw_edma_device_transfer(&xfer, dw_edma_device_get_config(dchan, config));
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this actually achieve the intended
atomic configuration and descriptor preparation mentioned in the commit
message?
Looking at dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg(), it still explicitly calls
dw_edma_device_config() before delegating to dw_edma_device_transfer().
The dw_edma_device_config() function locklessly mutates global channel state:
static int dw_edma_device_config(...)
{
...
if (cfg_non_ll || non_ll)
chan->non_ll = true;
...
memcpy(&chan->config, config, sizeof(*config));
chan->configured = true;
...
}
If multiple threads use this API concurrently for the same channel, could they
race on this memcpy() and global state updates?
Additionally, dw_edma_device_transfer() continues to read the globally mutated
chan->non_ll state to determine burst limits:
static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
dw_edma_device_transfer(...)
{
...
bursts_max = chan->non_ll ? 1 : chan->ll_max;
...
}
Because chan->non_ll is evaluated globally rather than from the locally passed
config, could a concurrent preparation silently alter the hardware burst
behavior of an ostensibly atomic and isolated descriptor preparation?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260521-dma_prep_config-v7-0-1f73f4899883@nxp.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 15:32 [PATCH v7 0/9] dmaengine: Add new API to combine configuration and descriptor preparation Frank.Li
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank.Li
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] dmaengine: Add safe API to combine configuration and preparation Frank.Li
2026-05-21 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank.Li
2026-05-21 17:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank.Li
2026-05-21 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank.Li
2026-05-21 18:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank.Li
2026-05-21 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank.Li
2026-05-21 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank.Li
2026-05-21 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_sg() API Frank.Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521181014.C4DCE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox