DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Devendra K Verma" <devendra.verma@amd.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 13:09:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529130941.A07AF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529122104.2533048-1-devendra.verma@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Unbounded iteration in `dw_hdma_v0_core_off()` causes out-of-bounds MMIO writes to unmapped register space.
- [High] DesignWare PCIe controller glue driver bounds checks were not updated to support the new 64-channel limits.
- [Medium] Hardcoded channel limits in the PCIe endpoint driver prevent utilizing more than 8 channels.
--

commit 5d2bdaca2c92c95288275a3210f192b8e7094b9e
Author: Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>

dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels

This commit adds support for up to 64 read and write channels in the
Designware HDMA controller driver, as per the hardware specification. It
introduces HDMA-specific macros and updates the initialization flow to use
the appropriate channel limits based on the IP version.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> index 0b30ce1385036..79f653da8e0fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ struct dw_edma_pcie_data {
>  	/* eDMA registers location */
>  	struct dw_edma_block		rg;
>  	/* eDMA memory linked list location */
> -	struct dw_edma_block		ll_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> -	struct dw_edma_block		ll_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
> +	struct dw_edma_block		ll_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> +	struct dw_edma_block		ll_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
>  	/* eDMA memory data location */
> -	struct dw_edma_block		dt_wr[EDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> -	struct dw_edma_block		dt_rd[EDMA_MAX_RD_CH];
> +	struct dw_edma_block		dt_wr[HDMA_MAX_WR_CH];
> +	struct dw_edma_block		dt_rd[HDMA_MAX_RD_CH];

[Severity: Medium]
Will this update actually allow utilizing more than 8 channels, or do the
static configuration structures still restrict it?

While these data structures are updated to support 64 channels, the static
configuration structures like xilinx_mdb_data and snps_edda_data are left
hardcoded to 8 and 2 channels, respectively.

During probe, dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data() computes the channel count
using min(pdata->wr_ch_cnt, FIELD_GET(...)). Since the initial
pdata->wr_ch_cnt is capped at 8, the driver will silently restrict the number
of channels to a maximum of 8, even if the underlying IP reports support for
up to 64 channels.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
> index 7759ba9b4850f..48e40efceb2ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>  
> -#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH			8
> +#define HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH			64

[Severity: Critical]
Does increasing this constant cause out-of-bounds MMIO writes during teardown?

Looking at dw_hdma_v0_core_off(), the code unconditionally iterates up to
HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH to disable channels, rather than using the dynamically
configured dw->wr_ch_cnt and dw->rd_ch_cnt.

Since each channel occupies 512 bytes, iterating 64 times writes to 32 KB of
register space. Existing endpoint devices like Xilinx MDB map only 8 KB of
register space.

Writing to MMIO offsets outside the mapped region can cause a translation fault
or an unhandled kernel paging request, resulting in a regression.

> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> index 1fafd5b0e3153..da7a5cc93ad43 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>  
>  #define EDMA_MAX_WR_CH                                  8
>  #define EDMA_MAX_RD_CH                                  8
> +#define HDMA_MAX_WR_CH                                  64
> +#define HDMA_MAX_RD_CH                                  64

[Severity: High]
Are there missing updates in the DesignWare PCIe controller glue driver
to support these new limits?

The function dw_pcie_edma_find_channels() in pcie-designware.c enforces a hard
limit of EDMA_MAX_WR_CH. If a device is configured for more than 8 channels,
the check pci->edma.ll_wr_cnt > EDMA_MAX_WR_CH will trigger and return
-EINVAL, causing initialization to fail.

Additionally, dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector() returns -EINVAL if the IRQ index
nr is greater than or equal to EDMA_MAX_WR_CH + EDMA_MAX_RD_CH, breaking
interrupts for higher channels.

This prevents the newly added feature from functioning on native host
controllers.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260529122104.2533048-1-devendra.verma@amd.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-29 12:21 [PATCH v1] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable HDMA 64R/W Channels Devendra K Verma
2026-05-29 13:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260529130941.A07AF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=devendra.verma@amd.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox