From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert channel ioremap to devm_of_iomap
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:13:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605221323.3AAB41F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605220134.43295-8-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing `irq_dispose_mapping()` for per-channel IRQs causes a mapping leak when a channel is removed.
- [High] Failure to propagate `-EPROBE_DEFER` and other negative error codes from `of_irq_get()`.
--
commit 6845fba6088aa0e893f716aacd6cf99383012ca1
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
dmaengine: fsldma: convert channel ioremap to devm_of_iomap
Replace of_iomap with devm_of_iomap for per-channel register
mappings. This eliminates the iounmap calls in both the probe
error path and fsl_dma_chan_remove, and simplifies the error
handling by returning directly on failure.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> index ee6e595c2972c..0d73ce3dbfe6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1192,17 +1189,12 @@ static int fsl_dma_chan_probe(struct fsldma_device *fdev,
> chan->irq ? chan->irq : fdev->irq);
>
> return 0;
[Severity: High]
Is there a failure to propagate -EPROBE_DEFER and other negative error codes
from of_irq_get() here?
The commit 'dmaengine: fsldma: replace irq_of_parse_and_map with of_irq_get'
switched to of_irq_get() specifically to handle negative error codes such as
-EPROBE_DEFER.
However, the error handling logic in fsldma_request_irqs() maps all values <=
0 to -ENODEV:
drivers/dma/fsldma.c:fsldma_request_irqs() {
...
if (chan->irq <= 0) {
chan_err(chan, "interrupts property missing in device tree\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
...
}
This forces negative error codes like -EPROBE_DEFER to become -ENODEV,
defeating the purpose of the migration by permanently aborting the probe
instead of deferring it.
> -
> -out_iounmap_regs:
> - iounmap(chan->regs);
> - return err;
> }
>
> static void fsl_dma_chan_remove(struct fsldma_chan *chan)
> {
> tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet);
> list_del(&chan->common.device_node);
> - iounmap(chan->regs);
[Severity: High]
Are we leaking the IRQ mapping when removing the channel?
In an earlier patch in the series ('dmaengine: fsldma: convert to
platform_get_irq_optional()'), the call to irq_dispose_mapping(chan->irq) was
removed from fsl_dma_chan_remove().
However, chan->irq is acquired using of_irq_get() (or previously
irq_of_parse_and_map()), which internally calls irq_create_of_mapping() and
allocates a mapping in the IRQ domain.
This mapping must be explicitly disposed of. Because the cleanup call was
removed and never re-introduced, the IRQ mapping is permanently leaked
whenever a DMA channel is removed or the driver unbinds.
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605220134.43295-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 22:01 [PATCH 00/10] dmaengine: fsldma: devm conversion, fixups, and cleanups Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 01/10] dmaengine: fsldma: kill tasklet before removing channel Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 22:29 ` Frank Li
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 02/10] dmaengine: fsldma: check dma_async_device_register() return value Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 03/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional() Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 04/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert to devm_kzalloc and fix error path Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 22:43 ` Frank Li
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 05/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert ioremap to devm_platform_ioremap_resource Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 22:41 ` Frank Li
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 06/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert channel allocation to devm_kzalloc Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 22:45 ` Frank Li
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 07/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert channel ioremap to devm_of_iomap Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 22:49 ` Frank Li
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 08/10] dmaengine: fsldma: replace irq_of_parse_and_map with of_irq_get Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 09/10] dmaengine: fsldma: convert to devm_request_irq Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 22:01 ` [PATCH 10/10] dmaengine: fsldma: replace ppc-specific accessors with portable generic ones Rosen Penev
2026-06-05 22:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] dmaengine: fsldma: devm conversion, fixups, and cleanups Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605221323.3AAB41F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox