DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 07/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix request_irqs unwind freeing unregistered IRQ
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:03:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611040328.D1A931F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611035245.13439-8-rosenp@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The error cleanup path in `fsl_dma_prep_memcpy` causes a Use-After-Free read when using `fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse` to free a list whose head is embedded in one of the freed elements.
- [High] Missing `tasklet_kill()` during channel teardown leads to Use-After-Free if a tasklet is pending or running.
--

commit d650ce798a908cef623fc8f4999005d166fe7691
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

dmaengine: fsldma: fix request_irqs unwind freeing unregistered IRQ

When fsldma_request_irqs() fails on a per-channel IRQ, the unwind
loop starts at the current index i, which calls free_irq() on the
IRQ that request_irq() just failed to register. Decrement i before
the loop to skip the failed channel.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> index 22d62d958abd9..285c5e284d425 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ static int fsldma_request_irqs(struct fsldma_device *fdev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unwind:
> -	for (/* none */; i >= 0; i--) {
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		chan = fdev->chan[i];
>  		if (!chan)
>  			continue;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing the error handling I noticed
a potential use-after-free in drivers/dma/fsldma.c.

In fsl_dma_prep_memcpy(), if a descriptor allocation fails, the error path
cleans up by calling fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse() and passing the list
head embedded in the `first` descriptor:

	fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(chan, &first->tx_list);

In fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(), the traversal is done using:

	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(desc, _desc, list, node)
		fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc);

Since the list head `&first->tx_list` is embedded within the memory that will
be freed, does the list traversal macro's increment step cause a read from
freed memory when it evaluates the previous node?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I found a potential missing
cleanup in the channel teardown path in drivers/dma/fsldma.c.

In fsldma_chan_irq(), a tasklet is scheduled:

	tasklet_schedule(&chan->tasklet);

During driver unbind or error handling, fsl_dma_chan_remove() frees the DMA
channel:

	kfree(chan);

Does fsl_dma_chan_remove() need to call tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet) before
freeing the channel memory? Even though fsldma_free_irqs() unregisters the
interrupt, if the tasklet is scheduled right before the IRQ is freed, could
the tasklet run after `chan` has been freed and cause a use-after-free?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611035245.13439-8-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  3:52 [PATCHv4 00/15] dmaengine: fsldma: devm conversion, fixups, and cleanups Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 01/15] dmaengine: fsldma: kill tasklet before removing channel Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 02/15] dmaengine: fsldma: drop desc_lock before invoking client callback Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 03/15] dmaengine: fsldma: halt DMA engine before freeing resources Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 04/15] dmaengine: fsldma: provide device_release callback Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 05/15] dmaengine: fsldma: check dma_async_device_register() return value Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 06/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix probe error path not freeing IRQs Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 07/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix request_irqs unwind freeing unregistered IRQ Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 08/15] dmaengine: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional() Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 09/15] dmaengine: fsldma: use devm_kzalloc() to simplify code Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 10/15] dmaengine: fsldma: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 11/15] dmaengine: fsldma: convert channel allocation to devm_kzalloc() Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 12/15] dmaengine: fsldma: use devm_of_iomap() to simplify code Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 13/15] dmaengine: fsldma: replace irq_of_parse_and_map with of_irq_get Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  4:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 14/15] dmaengine: fsldma: replace ppc-specific accessors with portable generic ones Rosen Penev
2026-06-11  3:52 ` [PATCHv4 15/15] dmaengine: fsldma: fix kernel-doc param names to match function signatures Rosen Penev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611040328.D1A931F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox