From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: fix wrong extended DRCMR base for SpacemiT K3
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 03:02:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615030248.7E8161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-k3-pdma-fix-drcmr-base-v1-1-ee1af124199f@linux.spacemit.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The interrupt handler `mmp_pdma_chan_handler` dereferences `phy->vchan` without checking if it is NULL, leading to a kernel panic.
- [High] Disabling a DMA channel by clearing all `run_bits` simultaneously drops 64-bit addressing capabilities, potentially corrupting DMA transfers while the hardware halts.
- [High] The driver destroys the DMA descriptor pool without synchronously killing the channel's tasklet, allowing a running tasklet to access freed resources.
--
commit 8ee69ab96e073f81f565ee82dce7689d911272ac
Author: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
dmaengine: mmp_pdma: fix wrong extended DRCMR base for SpacemiT K3
K3 PDMA shares the same DRCMR layout as K1, where the extended DRCMR
base address is 0x1100. Commit 6587b8661a0b ("dmaengine: mmp_pdma: add
SpacemiT K3 support") incorrectly defined DRCMR_EXT_BASE_K3 as 0x1000,
causing all DRCMR accesses for channels >= 64 to be off by 0x100. Drop the
bogus DRCMR_EXT_BASE_K3 macro and reuse DRCMR_EXT_BASE_DEFAULT for the K3 ops.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c b/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
> index 386e85cd4882a..78e3e07e681df 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1219,7 +1218,7 @@ static const struct mmp_pdma_ops spacemit_k3_pdma_ops = {
> .get_desc_dst_addr = get_desc_dst_addr_64,
> .run_bits = (DCSR_RUN | DCSR_LPAEEN | DCSR_EORIRQEN | DCSR_EORSTOPEN),
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can clearing all run_bits simultaneously
corrupt DMA transfers?
In disable_chan(), the driver stops the DMA by clearing pdev->ops->run_bits
from the DCSR register:
drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c:disable_chan() {
...
if (phy->vchan) {
struct mmp_pdma_device *pdev;
pdev = to_mmp_pdma_dev(phy->vchan->chan.device);
writel(dcsr & ~pdev->ops->run_bits, phy->base + reg);
...
}
Since a DMA channel does not halt instantaneously when the RUN bit is
cleared, simultaneously clearing DCSR_LPAEEN strips the upper 32 bits from
the DMA addresses of any remaining in-flight bursts.
This causes the final bursts to overwrite unintended memory in the lower 4GB.
Should only DCSR_RUN be toggled when stopping a channel?
> .dma_width = 64,
> - .drcmr_ext_base = DRCMR_EXT_BASE_K3,
> + .drcmr_ext_base = DRCMR_EXT_BASE_DEFAULT,
> };
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this code cause a kernel panic due
to a NULL pointer dereference?
In mmp_pdma_probe(), IRQs are requested for all channels while phy->vchan
is initialized to NULL. It is only set later when a client allocates a
channel.
If the hardware has pending interrupts from boot, or a spurious interrupt
fires, mmp_pdma_chan_handler() executes this:
drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c:mmp_pdma_chan_handler() {
...
if (clear_chan_irq(phy) != 0)
return IRQ_NONE;
tasklet_schedule(&phy->vchan->tasklet);
...
}
Since clear_chan_irq() returns 0 even if vchan is NULL, does the
unconditional dereference of phy->vchan->tasklet trigger a crash?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code allow a tasklet to access
freed resources?
In mmp_pdma_free_chan_resources(), the descriptor pool is destroyed:
drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c:mmp_pdma_free_chan_resources() {
...
dma_pool_destroy(chan->desc_pool);
chan->desc_pool = NULL;
chan->idle = true;
...
}
However, the driver never calls tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet) to synchronize
with the tasklet.
If dma_do_tasklet() is running concurrently on another CPU, it may block
until mmp_pdma_free_chan_resources() completes. Once it resumes, it attempts
to free descriptors using dma_pool_free() on the destroyed pool.
Can this lead to a use-after-free or a kernel oops?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-k3-pdma-fix-drcmr-base-v1-1-ee1af124199f@linux.spacemit.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 2:53 [PATCH] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: fix wrong extended DRCMR base for SpacemiT K3 Troy Mitchell
2026-06-15 3:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15 7:15 ` Troy Mitchell
2026-06-15 8:01 ` Guodong Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615030248.7E8161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox