DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: fix wrong extended DRCMR base for SpacemiT K3
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 03:02:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615030248.7E8161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-k3-pdma-fix-drcmr-base-v1-1-ee1af124199f@linux.spacemit.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The interrupt handler `mmp_pdma_chan_handler` dereferences `phy->vchan` without checking if it is NULL, leading to a kernel panic.
- [High] Disabling a DMA channel by clearing all `run_bits` simultaneously drops 64-bit addressing capabilities, potentially corrupting DMA transfers while the hardware halts.
- [High] The driver destroys the DMA descriptor pool without synchronously killing the channel's tasklet, allowing a running tasklet to access freed resources.
--

commit 8ee69ab96e073f81f565ee82dce7689d911272ac
Author: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>

dmaengine: mmp_pdma: fix wrong extended DRCMR base for SpacemiT K3

K3 PDMA shares the same DRCMR layout as K1, where the extended DRCMR
base address is 0x1100. Commit 6587b8661a0b ("dmaengine: mmp_pdma: add
SpacemiT K3 support") incorrectly defined DRCMR_EXT_BASE_K3 as 0x1000,
causing all DRCMR accesses for channels >= 64 to be off by 0x100. Drop the
bogus DRCMR_EXT_BASE_K3 macro and reuse DRCMR_EXT_BASE_DEFAULT for the K3 ops.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c b/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
> index 386e85cd4882a..78e3e07e681df 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1219,7 +1218,7 @@ static const struct mmp_pdma_ops spacemit_k3_pdma_ops = {
>  	.get_desc_dst_addr = get_desc_dst_addr_64,
>  	.run_bits = (DCSR_RUN | DCSR_LPAEEN | DCSR_EORIRQEN | DCSR_EORSTOPEN),

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can clearing all run_bits simultaneously
corrupt DMA transfers?

In disable_chan(), the driver stops the DMA by clearing pdev->ops->run_bits
from the DCSR register:

drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c:disable_chan() {
    ...
	if (phy->vchan) {
		struct mmp_pdma_device *pdev;

		pdev = to_mmp_pdma_dev(phy->vchan->chan.device);
		writel(dcsr & ~pdev->ops->run_bits, phy->base + reg);
    ...
}

Since a DMA channel does not halt instantaneously when the RUN bit is
cleared, simultaneously clearing DCSR_LPAEEN strips the upper 32 bits from
the DMA addresses of any remaining in-flight bursts.

This causes the final bursts to overwrite unintended memory in the lower 4GB.

Should only DCSR_RUN be toggled when stopping a channel?

>  	.dma_width = 64,
> -	.drcmr_ext_base = DRCMR_EXT_BASE_K3,
> +	.drcmr_ext_base = DRCMR_EXT_BASE_DEFAULT,
>  };

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this code cause a kernel panic due
to a NULL pointer dereference?

In mmp_pdma_probe(), IRQs are requested for all channels while phy->vchan
is initialized to NULL. It is only set later when a client allocates a
channel.

If the hardware has pending interrupts from boot, or a spurious interrupt
fires, mmp_pdma_chan_handler() executes this:

drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c:mmp_pdma_chan_handler() {
    ...
	if (clear_chan_irq(phy) != 0)
		return IRQ_NONE;

	tasklet_schedule(&phy->vchan->tasklet);
    ...
}

Since clear_chan_irq() returns 0 even if vchan is NULL, does the
unconditional dereference of phy->vchan->tasklet trigger a crash?


[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code allow a tasklet to access
freed resources?

In mmp_pdma_free_chan_resources(), the descriptor pool is destroyed:

drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c:mmp_pdma_free_chan_resources() {
    ...
	dma_pool_destroy(chan->desc_pool);
	chan->desc_pool = NULL;
	chan->idle = true;
    ...
}

However, the driver never calls tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet) to synchronize
with the tasklet.

If dma_do_tasklet() is running concurrently on another CPU, it may block
until mmp_pdma_free_chan_resources() completes. Once it resumes, it attempts
to free descriptors using dma_pool_free() on the destroyed pool.

Can this lead to a use-after-free or a kernel oops?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-k3-pdma-fix-drcmr-base-v1-1-ee1af124199f@linux.spacemit.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15  2:53 [PATCH] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: fix wrong extended DRCMR base for SpacemiT K3 Troy Mitchell
2026-06-15  3:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15  7:15 ` Troy Mitchell
2026-06-15  8:01 ` Guodong Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615030248.7E8161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox