From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: idxd: fix use-after-free in idxd_free() and idxd_alloc() error paths
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 13:55:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618135503.755401F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618113254.493582-1-bogdan.codres@windriver.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Widespread double-free vulnerabilities and use-after-free of internal arrays and workqueues on probe failure paths.
- [High] Kernel panic via `destroy_workqueue(NULL)` in `idxd_conf_device_release()` during early allocation failures.
--
commit 5374b010ac47ca9ae57388435db01f775b2c068e
Author: Bogdan Codres <bogdan.codres@windriver.com>
dmaengine: idxd: fix use-after-free in idxd_free() and idxd_alloc() error paths
This patch fixes a use-after-free bug in the error paths of idxd_free() and
idxd_alloc(). It removes duplicate frees by letting put_device() handle all
resource cleanup via the release callback.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> index f1cfc7790d950..def37db80d5b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> @@ -601,15 +601,18 @@ static void idxd_read_caps(struct idxd_device *idxd)
[ ... ]
> +/*
> + * Release an idxd device that was allocated (device_initialize() was called)
> + * but never successfully registered. put_device() drops the last reference and
> + * triggers idxd_conf_device_release() which frees all resources including the
> + * ida, opcap_bmap, and the idxd structure itself.
> + */
> static void idxd_free(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> {
> if (!idxd)
> return;
>
> put_device(idxd_confdev(idxd));
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does centralizing the cleanup around
put_device() here expose a double-free during probe failures?
If idxd_probe() fails after partial initialization (like a failure in
idxd_device_load_config()), it explicitly calls idxd_cleanup_internals(idxd)
which frees several pointers and destroys the workqueue:
idxd_cleanup_internals() {
...
destroy_workqueue(idxd->wq);
}
However, it doesn't set these pointers to NULL. When the error propagates
and eventually calls idxd_free(), put_device() triggers
idxd_conf_device_release() which attempts to free those same pointers again:
idxd_conf_device_release() {
...
destroy_workqueue(idxd->wq);
kfree(idxd->groups);
kfree(idxd->wqs);
kfree(idxd->engines);
}
Could this result in slab corruption and a double-destroy of the workqueue?
Also, sub-cleanup functions like idxd_clean_wqs() exhibit a similar pattern
where put_device() triggers idxd_conf_wq_release() (freeing the wq, wqcfg,
and opcap_bmap), but the cleanup loop immediately calls kfree(wq) and
bitmap_free() again.
> - bitmap_free(idxd->opcap_bmap);
> - ida_free(&idxd_ida, idxd->id);
> - kfree(idxd);
> }
>
> static struct idxd_device *idxd_alloc(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct idxd_driver_data *data)
[ ... ]
> @@ -649,8 +652,12 @@ static struct idxd_device *idxd_alloc(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct idxd_driver_d
> return idxd;
>
> err_name:
> + /* device_initialize() was called, so put_device() will trigger
> + * idxd_conf_device_release() which frees ida, opcap_bmap, and idxd.
> + * Do not fall through to err_opcap/err_ida.
> + */
> put_device(conf_dev);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but will this put_device() call
trigger a kernel panic if early allocation fails?
If idxd_alloc() jumps to the err_name label (for instance, if
dev_set_name() fails), idxd->wq has not been allocated yet. Because
device_initialize() was called, put_device() synchronously invokes the
release callback:
idxd_conf_device_release() {
...
destroy_workqueue(idxd->wq);
}
Since destroy_workqueue() does not check for NULL before dereferencing its
argument, does this result in a deterministic panic when idxd->wq is NULL?
> - bitmap_free(idxd->opcap_bmap);
> + return NULL;
> err_opcap:
> ida_free(&idxd_ida, idxd->id);
> err_ida:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260618113254.493582-1-bogdan.codres@windriver.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 10:39 [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: fix use-after-free in idxd_free() and idxd_alloc() error paths Bogdan Codres (Wind River)
2026-06-15 10:39 ` Bogdan Codres (Wind River)
2026-06-15 11:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 21:09 ` Frank Li
2026-06-18 11:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Bogdan Codres (Wind River)
2026-06-18 13:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260618135503.755401F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox