From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yuanshen Cao" <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add set_addr function pointer for variable address widths
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:51:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260621215103.EED171F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621-sun60i-a733-dma-v2-2-340f205891cc@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free during error path cleanup in sun6i_dma_prep_slave_sg and sun6i_dma_prep_dma_cyclic.
--
commit 9bdc9020fe709f46ed0cba2bea4a233b8e23c603
Author: Yuanshen Cao <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add set_addr function pointer for variable address widths
This commit refactors the sun6i DMA driver by moving the address setting logic
into a function pointer within the configuration structure. This allows
handling of different hardware variations, specifically adding support for
the A733's 32G high-address bits while preserving legacy behavior for
older generations.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> index ef3052c4ab363..9984b9033cbb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> @@ -138,6 +139,8 @@ struct sun6i_dma_config {
> void (*set_burst_length)(u32 *p_cfg, s8 src_burst, s8 dst_burst);
> void (*set_drq)(u32 *p_cfg, s8 src_drq, s8 dst_drq);
> void (*set_mode)(u32 *p_cfg, s8 src_mode, s8 dst_mode);
> + void (*set_addr)(struct sun6i_dma_dev *sdev, struct sun6i_dma_lli *v_lli,
> + dma_addr_t src, dma_addr_t dst);
> void (*dump_com_regs)(struct sun6i_dma_dev *sdev);
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential use-after-free
in the error cleanup paths.
Looking at sun6i_dma_prep_slave_sg():
err_lli_free:
for (p_lli = txd->p_lli, v_lli = txd->v_lli; v_lli;
p_lli = v_lli->p_lli_next, v_lli = v_lli->v_lli_next)
dma_pool_free(sdev->pool, v_lli, p_lli);
Does this loop cause a use-after-free? The dma_pool_free() call frees
v_lli, but the loop increment step then dereferences it via
v_lli = v_lli->v_lli_next.
This exact same pattern also appears in sun6i_dma_prep_dma_cyclic():
err_lli_free:
for (p_lli = txd->p_lli, v_lli = txd->v_lli; v_lli;
p_lli = v_lli->p_lli_next, v_lli = v_lli->v_lli_next)
dma_pool_free(sdev->pool, v_lli, p_lli);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260621-sun60i-a733-dma-v2-0-340f205891cc@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-21 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 21:40 [PATCH v2 0/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-06-21 21:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Refactor to support A733 interrupt and register handling Yuanshen Cao
2026-06-21 21:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 22:14 ` Frank Li
2026-06-21 21:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add set_addr function pointer for variable address widths Yuanshen Cao
2026-06-21 21:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-21 22:16 ` Frank Li
2026-06-21 21:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Add num_channels_per_reg for flexible interrupt mapping Yuanshen Cao
2026-06-21 21:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 22:18 ` Frank Li
2026-06-21 21:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] dt-bindings: dma: sun50i-a64-dma: Add allwinner,sun60i-a733-dma compatible string Yuanshen Cao
2026-06-21 21:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 22:19 ` Frank Li
2026-06-21 21:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] dmaengine: sun6i-dma: Implement support for Allwinner A733 DMA controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-06-21 21:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 22:22 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260621215103.EED171F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.caoys@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox