From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Benoît Monin" <benoit.monin@bootlin.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: Support dynamic scatter/gather chaining
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:22:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710122206.E38231F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-fsl-edma-dyn-sg-v6-2-831b96be3f31@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Dynamically linked descriptors are incorrectly re-executed if the hardware completes the entire scatter/gather chain before the interrupt handler runs.
- [Critical] Dynamic scatter/gather chaining loses the `link_sg_id` on multi-TCD descriptors, causing the interrupt handler to incorrectly reap actively executing descriptors.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v6 2/2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: Support dynamic scatter/gather chaining ---
commit 7b2e56fb9781985df561a9463fc3de1f384eab25
Author: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@bootlin.com>
dmaengine: fsl-edma: Support dynamic scatter/gather chaining
Implement dynamic linking of scatter/gather transfers to enable
chaining multiple DMA descriptors without stopping the channel.
This avoids waiting for the channel to go idle if there is another
transaction already issued.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
> index c10190164926a..6cca5dca8d60a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
> @@ -58,11 +61,29 @@ void fsl_edma_tx_chan_handler(struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan)
> list_del(&fsl_chan->edesc->vdesc.node);
> vchan_cookie_complete(&fsl_chan->edesc->vdesc);
> fsl_chan->edesc = NULL;
> - fsl_chan->status = DMA_COMPLETE;
> + if (!(fsl_edma_drvflags(fsl_chan) & FSL_EDMA_DRV_SPLIT_REG) ||
> + (edma_readl_chreg(fsl_chan, ch_csr) & EDMA_V3_CH_CSR_DONE)) {
> + fsl_chan->status = DMA_COMPLETE;
> + }
> } else {
> vchan_cyclic_callback(&fsl_chan->edesc->vdesc);
> }
>
> + if (!fsl_chan->edesc && fsl_chan->status != DMA_COMPLETE) {
[Severity: Critical]
If the hardware completes the entire scatter/gather chain before the interrupt
handler runs, fsl_chan->status will be set to DMA_COMPLETE above.
Does this condition then cause the handler to entirely skip reaping the
completed intermediate descriptors?
> + u8 link_sg_id = FIELD_GET(EDMA_TCD_CSR_LINKCH, edma_read_tcdreg(fsl_chan, csr));
> + struct virt_dma_desc *vdesc, *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(vdesc, tmp, &fsl_chan->vchan.desc_issued, node) {
> + struct fsl_edma_desc *fsl_desc = to_fsl_edma_desc(vdesc);
> +
> + if (link_sg_id == fsl_desc->link_sg_id)
> + break;
> +
> + list_del(&vdesc->node);
> + vchan_cookie_complete(vdesc);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!fsl_chan->edesc)
> fsl_edma_xfer_desc(fsl_chan);
[Severity: Critical]
If the intermediate descriptors are not reaped because fsl_chan->status is
DMA_COMPLETE, will fsl_edma_xfer_desc() pop those already-finished descriptors
from the desc_issued list and re-submit them, causing duplicate I/O execution?
[ ... ]
> @@ -924,14 +945,74 @@ void fsl_edma_xfer_desc(struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan)
[ ... ]
> +static void fsl_edma_link_sg(struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan, struct fsl_edma_desc *fsl_desc)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + first_csr |= FIELD_PREP(EDMA_TCD_CSR_LINKCH, fsl_chan->link_sg_id++);
> + fsl_edma_set_tcd_to_le(fsl_chan, first_tcd, first_csr, csr);
> + fsl_desc->link_sg_id = FIELD_GET(EDMA_TCD_CSR_LINKCH, first_csr);
[Severity: Critical]
This embedded link_sg_id appears to only be set on the first TCD of the
descriptor.
If fsl_desc has multiple TCDs, when the hardware progresses to the second TCD,
will it load a link_sg_id of 0?
If an interrupt fires while the second TCD is active, would
fsl_edma_tx_chan_handler() read the hardware CSR as 0 and mistakenly reap the
actively executing descriptor since it won't match fsl_desc->link_sg_id?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710-fsl-edma-dyn-sg-v6-0-831b96be3f31@bootlin.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 12:06 [PATCH v6 0/2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: Scatter/gather improvements Benoît Monin
2026-07-10 12:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: Implement device_prep_peripheral_dma_vec Benoît Monin
2026-07-10 12:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 15:18 ` Frank Li
2026-07-10 12:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: Support dynamic scatter/gather chaining Benoît Monin
2026-07-10 12:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-10 15:22 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710122206.E38231F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=benoit.monin@bootlin.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox