From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: epf-mhi: Implement mhi_cntrl->flush_async() to flush DMA read/write
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:32:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714123215.AB8201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714-mhi-ep-flush-v2-3-b6a9db011e85@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Deadlock / Infinite wait in pci_epf_mhi_edma_flush_async() when synchronizing globally shared DMA channels.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing NULL pointer dereference on PCI link flap exacerbated by unconditional cleanup dereference.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: epf-mhi: Implement mhi_cntrl->flush_async() to flush DMA read/write ---
commit c83c3a93b470add22e521d4fb56e38b2a49dd98b
Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
PCI: epf-mhi: Implement mhi_cntrl->flush_async() to flush DMA read/write
The MHI core needs to make sure that all the current DMA transactions are
completed before removing the channels. So implement the
mhi_cntrl->flush_async() callback by first making sure all the in-flight
DMA operations are completed and then flushing the DMA workqueue.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -644,6 +644,15 @@ static int pci_epf_mhi_edma_write_async(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void pci_epf_mhi_edma_flush_async(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl)
> +{
> + struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = to_epf_mhi(mhi_cntrl);
> +
> + dmaengine_synchronize(epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx);
> + dmaengine_synchronize(epf_mhi->dma_chan_tx);
> + flush_workqueue(epf_mhi->dma_wq);
[Severity: High]
Can this cause an indefinite hang if other channels on the same controller
are active?
If a user unloads an MHI client module (invoking mhi_ep_remove), it calls
this function to drain the DMA channel. However, because
epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx and dma_chan_tx are globally shared across the entire
PCI endpoint, and dmaengine_synchronize() polls until the channel is no
longer busy, continuous data traffic from a different independent MHI
client might prevent this from ever returning.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this also lead to a NULL pointer
dereference after a PCI link flap?
When the PCI link goes down, pci_epf_mhi_link_down() calls
pci_epf_mhi_dma_deinit(), which frees the DMA channels and workqueue and
sets them to NULL.
When the link comes back up, pci_epf_mhi_link_up() unconditionally assigns
these EDMA callbacks but fails to call pci_epf_mhi_dma_init() to reallocate
the resources.
If the link goes down again (or a client device is removed), invoking this
new flush_async() callback will pass NULL pointers to
dmaengine_synchronize() and flush_workqueue(), causing a crash.
> +}
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714-mhi-ep-flush-v2-0-b6a9db011e85@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 12:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] bus: mhi: ep: Implement flush_async() callback to flush async read/write Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-14 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Implement device_synchronize() callback Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-14 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] bus: mhi: ep: Add mhi_cntrl->flush_async() callback to flush the async read/write Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-14 12:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: epf-mhi: Implement mhi_cntrl->flush_async() to flush DMA read/write Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-14 12:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714123215.AB8201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox