From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Serialize channel state checks
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:19:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715181921.CA6551F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715175740.1110404-6-den@valinux.co.jp>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `dw_edma_device_terminate_all()` fails to actually stop the DMA hardware engine, leaving it vulnerable to permanent hangs if the hardware stalls.
- [High] The driver advertises `DMA_CYCLIC` support and accepts cyclic transfers, but fails to implement true infinite looping or fire the required period completion callbacks.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v3 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Serialize channel state checks ---
commit 1467b5248fd39f737e5901d6f209dccdfffd622e
Author: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Serialize channel state checks
The commit fixes a race condition between pause()/resume() and interrupt
handlers by extending vc.lock coverage to include channel state checks.
This prevents the channel from becoming permanently wedged due to missed state
updates, and ensures issue_pending() uses the correct configuration state.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index b06b299661c02..8b0e2af734da9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does dw_edma_device_terminate_all() fail to
actually stop the DMA hardware engine?
If the hardware stalls (e.g., due to an unresponsive peripheral or AXI bus
hang), it looks like the DMA channel could become permanently wedged. When a
client calls dmaengine_terminate_all() to abort a transfer, the code sets a
software flag:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:dw_edma_device_terminate_all() {
...
} else if (chan->request > EDMA_REQ_PAUSE) {
err = -EPERM;
} else {
chan->request = EDMA_REQ_STOP;
}
...
}
Will this cause the polling loop in dw_edma_wait_termination() to time out
if the hardware is stalled and the interrupt never fires? Should the hardware
be explicitly stopped rather than relying exclusively on natural completion?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the driver fail to implement true
infinite looping for DMA_CYCLIC transfers?
When a client submits a cyclic transfer via device_prep_dma_cyclic(), it is
unrolled into a finite list of bursts based on xfer.cyclic.cnt. However, in
dw_edma_done_interrupt(), the descriptor appears to be completely finished
without calling vchan_cyclic_callback(vd):
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:dw_edma_done_interrupt() {
...
case EDMA_REQ_PAUSE:
desc = vd2dw_edma_desc(vd);
if (!desc->chunks_alloc) {
dw_hdma_set_callback_result(vd,
DMA_TRANS_NOERROR);
list_del(&vd->node);
vchan_cookie_complete(vd);
}
...
}
Will this cause subsystems relying on cyclic DMA (like ALSA for audio) to hang
indefinitely while waiting for period completion events?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715175740.1110404-1-den@valinux.co.jp?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 17:57 [PATCH v3 0/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fixes and interrupt-path groundwork Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix HDMA channel status register access Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Terminate all descriptors without callbacks Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 18:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 18:54 ` Frank Li
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Serialize abort state updates Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 18:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 18:55 ` Frank Li
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Complete descriptors before pausing Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 18:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 18:56 ` Frank Li
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Serialize channel state checks Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 18:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 18:58 ` Frank Li
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Clear stale requests on termination Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 18:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 19:00 ` Frank Li
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Drop redundant pci_free_irq_vectors() Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Snapshot the v0 interrupt status once per handler pass Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Defer channel IRQ handling to workqueue Koichiro Den
2026-07-15 18:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 19:02 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715181921.CA6551F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox