From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 22:34:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717223447.B3FEF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717221001.361421-5-logang@deltatee.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Partial failure in dma_async_device_register() leaks global dma_ida and per-device chan_ida.
- [High] Use-after-free in ioat_dma_do_interrupt() due to mixing devres IRQ registration with manual kfree on the probe error path.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v1 4/6] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device ---
(Note: The format of this review is altered from the usual inline commenting style due to recitation restrictions. No patch diffs are quoted below.)
commit 29a5621a4420e7d413fe2125067821903edd8980
Author: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device
This commit fixes a dangling device registration issue by moving the
PCIe relaxed ordering disablement before the dma_async_device_register()
call. This ensures that the device does not remain in the core's list
if an error occurs later in the probe function.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260707165906.249F41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/T/#u
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential
resource leak in drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:dma_async_device_register().
When a failure occurs and device->chancnt is greater than 0, the code
jumps to the err_out label. However, this path seems to bypass freeing
the global dma_ida:
err_out:
/* if we never registered a channel just release the idr */
if (!device->chancnt) {
ida_free(&dma_ida, device->dev_id);
return rc;
}
Additionally, the loop that unregisters the channel devices omits calling
ida_free(&device->chan_ida, chan->chan_id) and device->chancnt--.
If a device probe fails due to memory pressure or hotplug errors, will this
leak the global dma_ida and per-device chan_ida? If the global dma_ida
space is exhausted, it might prevent any further DMA devices from
registering system-wide.
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but is there a risk of a use-after-free
on the probe error path?
In drivers/dma/ioat/init.c:ioat_dma_setup_interrupts(), a shared interrupt
is registered via devm_request_irq(), tying its lifetime to the device core.
However, if ioat_pci_probe() later fails, it manually calls kfree(device):
ioat_pci_probe() {
...
if (err) {
for (i = 0; i < IOAT_MAX_CHANS; i++)
kfree(device->idx[i]);
kfree(device);
...
}
Because the IRQ was allocated with devres, it remains active until
ioat_pci_probe() returns and the driver core runs the devres cleanup.
If another device sharing this interrupt line triggers an IRQ during this
window, wouldn't drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c:ioat_dma_do_interrupt()
dereference the freed instance pointer?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717221001.361421-1-logang@deltatee.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 22:09 [PATCH v1 0/6] dmaengine: miscellaneous fixes for ioat, switchtec_dma and plx_dma Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix double-free in switchtec_dma_free_desc() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix resource leak in alloc_chan_resources Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix channel leak on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 22:10 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] dmaengine: ioat: use sysfs_emit() in per-channel sysfs show() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:10 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] dmaengine: plx_dma: fix NULL pointer deref in plx_dma_isr() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717223447.B3FEF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox