DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 22:34:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717223447.B3FEF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717221001.361421-5-logang@deltatee.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Partial failure in dma_async_device_register() leaks global dma_ida and per-device chan_ida.
- [High] Use-after-free in ioat_dma_do_interrupt() due to mixing devres IRQ registration with manual kfree on the probe error path.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v1 4/6] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device ---
(Note: The format of this review is altered from the usual inline commenting style due to recitation restrictions. No patch diffs are quoted below.)

commit 29a5621a4420e7d413fe2125067821903edd8980
Author: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device

This commit fixes a dangling device registration issue by moving the 
PCIe relaxed ordering disablement before the dma_async_device_register() 
call. This ensures that the device does not remain in the core's list 
if an error occurs later in the probe function.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260707165906.249F41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/T/#u

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential 
resource leak in drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:dma_async_device_register().

When a failure occurs and device->chancnt is greater than 0, the code 
jumps to the err_out label. However, this path seems to bypass freeing 
the global dma_ida:

err_out:
    /* if we never registered a channel just release the idr */
    if (!device->chancnt) {
        ida_free(&dma_ida, device->dev_id);
        return rc;
    }

Additionally, the loop that unregisters the channel devices omits calling 
ida_free(&device->chan_ida, chan->chan_id) and device->chancnt--. 

If a device probe fails due to memory pressure or hotplug errors, will this 
leak the global dma_ida and per-device chan_ida? If the global dma_ida 
space is exhausted, it might prevent any further DMA devices from 
registering system-wide.

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but is there a risk of a use-after-free 
on the probe error path?

In drivers/dma/ioat/init.c:ioat_dma_setup_interrupts(), a shared interrupt 
is registered via devm_request_irq(), tying its lifetime to the device core. 
However, if ioat_pci_probe() later fails, it manually calls kfree(device):

ioat_pci_probe() {
    ...
    if (err) {
        for (i = 0; i < IOAT_MAX_CHANS; i++)
            kfree(device->idx[i]);
        kfree(device);
    ...
}

Because the IRQ was allocated with devres, it remains active until 
ioat_pci_probe() returns and the driver core runs the devres cleanup. 
If another device sharing this interrupt line triggers an IRQ during this 
window, wouldn't drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c:ioat_dma_do_interrupt() 
dereference the freed instance pointer?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717221001.361421-1-logang@deltatee.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 22:09 [PATCH v1 0/6] dmaengine: miscellaneous fixes for ioat, switchtec_dma and plx_dma Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix double-free in switchtec_dma_free_desc() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix resource leak in alloc_chan_resources Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix channel leak on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:34   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 22:10 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] dmaengine: ioat: use sysfs_emit() in per-channel sysfs show() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:10 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] dmaengine: plx_dma: fix NULL pointer deref in plx_dma_isr() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 22:32   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717223447.B3FEF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox