DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi" <s-adivi@ti.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move descriptor management to k3-udma-common.c
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:56:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810155642.DBB241F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810151423.1948224-6-s-adivi@ti.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Swapped arguments to `cppi5_trdesc_calc_size` causes heap buffer under-allocation.
- [High] Missing `.remove` callback in platform driver leads to UAF on module unload.
- [High] Global channel state overwritten without locks during descriptor preparation.
- [High] Race condition between teardown IRQ and `udma_free_chan_resources` causes Double Free.
- [High] Zero-length scatterlist (`sglen == 0`) causes out-of-bounds array access and wild pointer dereference.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v8 05/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move descriptor management to k3-udma-common.c ---
commit 2f5a11e37f11d6bdbc83b58ccea07da9ab136d47
Author: Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi <s-adivi@ti.com>

dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move descriptor management to k3-udma-common.c

Refactor the K3 UDMA driver by moving all DMA descriptor handling
functions from k3-udma.c to a new common library, k3-udma-common.c.
This prepares the driver for supporting new K3 UDMA v2 variant.
No functional changes intended.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-common.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-common.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..3130805a8ec40
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-common.c
[ ... ]
> +	if (uc->use_dma_pool) {
> +		hwdesc->cppi5_desc_size = uc->config.hdesc_size;
> +		hwdesc->cppi5_desc_vaddr = dma_pool_zalloc(uc->hdesc_pool,
> +							   GFP_NOWAIT,
> +							   &hwdesc->cppi5_desc_paddr);
> +	} else {
> +		hwdesc->cppi5_desc_size = cppi5_trdesc_calc_size(tr_size,
> +								 tr_count);

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but are the arguments to
cppi5_trdesc_calc_size() swapped here?

The function signature expects the count first and then the size, but it
is called with tr_size as the first argument.

When processing a scatterlist with a large number of segments where the
count exceeds the size, could this result in an under-allocation and
a subsequent heap buffer overflow?

[ ... ]
> +		d->residue += sg_dma_len(sgent);
> +	}
> +
> +	cppi5_tr_csf_set(&tr_req[tr_idx - 1].flags,
> +			 CPPI5_TR_CSF_SUPR_EVT | CPPI5_TR_CSF_EOP);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but what happens if a consumer
submits a zero-length scatterlist?

If sglen is 0, the tr_idx variable remains 0. Does this result in a
write to tr_req[-1], causing an out-of-bounds access and corrupting
the descriptor header?

[ ... ]
> +	if (d->residue >= SZ_4M) {
> +		dev_err(uc->ud->dev,
> +			"%s: Transfer size %u is over the supported 4M range\n",
> +			__func__, d->residue);
> +		udma_free_hwdesc(uc, d);
> +		kfree(d);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	h_desc = d->hwdesc[0].cppi5_desc_vaddr;
> +	cppi5_hdesc_set_pktlen(h_desc, d->residue);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but similar to the above, if a consumer
provides a zero-length scatterlist, the flexible array hwdesc is
allocated with zero elements.

Since the code unconditionally accesses the first element of the flexible
array to retrieve h_desc, could this lead to an out-of-bounds pointer
dereference and memory corruption?

[ ... ]
> +	if (!burst)
> +		burst = 1;
> +
> +	uc->config.tx_flags = tx_flags;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but it looks like the global
channel state is being modified without holding the vc.lock.

If a consumer prepares multiple descriptors concurrently with different
flags, could the last prepared descriptor overwrite the channel state?

When udma_is_desc_really_done() checks the flags later, this might cause
it to skip the stall check and falsely complete the transfer while data
remains in the DMA fabric.

[ ... ]
> +	if (dir != uc->config.dir) {
> +		dev_err(chan->device->dev,
> +			"%s: chan%d is for %s, not supporting %s\n",
> +			__func__, uc->id,
> +			dmaengine_get_direction_text(uc->config.dir),
> +			dmaengine_get_direction_text(dir));
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	uc->cyclic = true;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but similar to the tx_flags modification,
this global channel state is being updated without holding any lock.

Can this lead to the same race conditions and data corruption if
concurrently modified?

I also noticed a few other pre-existing issues in the surrounding
driver code that might be worth looking into while refactoring.

[Severity: High]
In drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c, there appears to be a race condition between
udma_free_chan_resources() and the teardown IRQ handler:

udma_free_chan_resources() {
    ...
    udma_terminate_all(chan);
    if (uc->terminated_desc) {
        udma_reset_chan(uc, false);
        udma_reset_rings(uc);
    }
}

The udma_reset_rings() function checks for uc->terminated_desc and frees
it without holding the lock.

If udma_terminate_all() triggers a hardware teardown completion message,
and the IRQ handler concurrently takes the lock and frees the descriptor,
do both threads end up freeing the same terminated_desc, leading to a
double free?

[Severity: High]
Also in drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c, the platform_driver definition lacks
a remove callback:

static struct platform_driver udma_driver = {
    .driver = {
        .name = "ti-k3-udma",
        .of_match_table = udma_of_match,
        .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
    },
    .probe = udma_probe,
};

Because this is a tristate module, if the driver is unloaded via rmmod,
the registrations from udma_probe() are not symmetrically torn down.

Since devres will free the memory while the DMA engine subsystem retains
pointers to it, could this cause a use-after-free upon the next DMA access?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810151423.1948224-1-s-adivi@ti.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 15:13 [PATCH v8 00/19] dmaengine: ti: Add support for BCDMA v2 and PKTDMA v2 Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:13 ` [PATCH v8 01/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Fix sporadic crash on AM62x Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:13 ` [PATCH v8 02/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move macros to header file Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:13 ` [PATCH v8 03/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move structs and enums " Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:13 ` [PATCH v8 04/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move static inline helper functions " Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:13 ` [PATCH v8 05/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move descriptor management to k3-udma-common.c Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 06/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move ring management functions " Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 07/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add variant-specific function pointers to udma_dev Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 16:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 08/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move udma utility functions to k3-udma-common.c Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 16:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 09/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move resource management " Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 16:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 10/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: refactor resource setup functions Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 11/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: move inclusion of k3-udma-private.c to k3-udma-common.c Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 16:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 12/19] drivers: soc: ti: k3-ringacc: handle absence of tisci Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 16:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 13/19] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add K3 BCDMA V2 Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 14/19] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add K3 PKTDMA V2 Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 15/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-psil-am62l: Add AM62Lx PSIL and PDMA data Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 16:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 16/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-v2: New driver for K3 BCDMA_V2 Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 17:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 17/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-v2: Add support for PKTDMA V2 Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 17:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 18/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-v2: Update glue layer to support " Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 17:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:14 ` [PATCH v8 19/19] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Validate resource ID and fix logging in reservation Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi
2026-08-10 17:35   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810155642.DBB241F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-adivi@ti.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox