From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 22:46:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819224626.83C151F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-dma40-fixes-v1-1-5e14815ad689@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Returning ERR_PTR(err) from d40_queue_start() introduces a PM runtime reference leak and breaks caller logic in dma_tc_handle().
- [High] Freeing a submitted descriptor directly on error bypasses the DMA framework, causing the client to hang.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup ---
commit 0baedf8f0f8ca2b28e1d6d6a6bce21f2db82302b
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Date: Wed Aug 19 22:35:57 2026 +0000
dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup
If d40_start() fails after a queued descriptor has been moved to the active
list, d40_queue_start() currently returns NULL without unwinding the
descriptor state or clearing the channel busy flag. This commit attempts
to fix the error path by freeing the descriptor and returning an error pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260618051539.15E201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> @@ -1531,8 +1531,12 @@ static struct d40_desc *d40_queue_start(struct d40_chan *d40c)
> /* Start dma job */
> err = d40_start(d40c);
>
> - if (err)
> - return NULL;
> + if (err) {
> + d40_desc_remove(d40d);
> + d40_desc_free(d40c, d40d);
[Severity: High]
Does silently freeing the submitted descriptor here cause the DMA client to
hang?
The descriptor has already been submitted to the DMA framework, which means the
client holds a cookie and expects a completion callback. Bypassing the
framework and freeing the memory directly prevents the framework from completing
the cookie, meaning the client will wait indefinitely for a callback that will
never arrive.
> + d40c->busy = false;
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
[Severity: High]
Does returning ERR_PTR(err) here introduce a PM runtime reference leak?
Earlier in d40_queue_start(), a PM runtime reference is acquired:
if (d40d != NULL) {
if (!d40c->busy) {
d40c->busy = true;
pm_runtime_get_sync(d40c->base->dev);
}
This error path returns ERR_PTR(err) and sets busy to false without dropping
that newly acquired reference.
Additionally, changing the return value breaks the caller logic in
dma_tc_handle(), which explicitly checks for a NULL return to drop the PM
reference:
drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:dma_tc_handle() {
...
if (d40_queue_start(d40c) == NULL) {
d40c->busy = false;
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(d40c->base->dev);
}
...
}
Because ERR_PTR(err) is not NULL, this condition evaluates to false, skipping
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() and leaking the reference.
> + }
> }
>
> return d40d;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-dma40-fixes-v1-0-5e14815ad689@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 22:35 [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe and allocation bugs Linus Walleij
2026-08-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup Linus Walleij
2026-08-19 22:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable Linus Walleij
2026-08-19 22:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak Linus Walleij
2026-08-19 22:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 22:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check Linus Walleij
2026-08-19 22:50 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819224626.83C151F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox