From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 04:56:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260823045641.2E8B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260823044900.11466-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The globally exported pointer `bcom_eng` is left dangling if `mpc52xx_bcom_probe()` fails after allocating it, leading to a potential Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early ---
commit 58088fd211b9916066bb25d1ffe4afa62733063f
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early
This commit replaces open-coded resource lookup and mapping in the
probe function with the managed devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()
helper. It also addresses a resource size mismatch between allocation
and freeing.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c b/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c
> --- a/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -439,10 +422,6 @@ static int mpc52xx_bcom_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> return 0;
>
> /* Error path */
> -error_unmap:
> - iounmap(bcom_eng->regs);
> -error_release:
> - release_mem_region(res_bcom.start, sizeof(struct mpc52xx_sdma));
> error_sramclean:
> kfree(bcom_eng);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if mpc52xx_bcom_probe() fails after
allocating bcom_eng (for instance, if bcom_engine_init() fails), does this
leave the globally exported pointer bcom_eng dangling?
If it remains non-NULL after kfree(), a dependent driver like mpc52xx_fec
might later call bcom_task_alloc(), which checks if (!bcom_eng) to verify
initialization. Since the check passes, could this lead to a use-after-free
when it accesses bcom_eng->lock?
Should bcom_eng be set to NULL here, similar to how it is handled in
mpc52xx_bcom_remove()?
> bcom_sram_cleanup();
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260823044900.11466-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 4:49 [PATCH] dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early Rosen Penev
2026-08-23 4:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-23 8:00 ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-24 20:23 ` Rosen Penev
2026-08-25 7:56 ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-24 15:25 ` [PATCH] " Frank Li
2026-08-24 20:24 ` Rosen Penev
2026-08-25 14:39 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260823045641.2E8B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox