From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Wang" <wangjia@ultrarisc.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Fix LLI dump out-of-bounds access
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 01:04:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828010412.6971A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828-dma-fix-v1-2-a6947f487e07@ultrarisc.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The exact same out-of-bounds array access bug that this commit fixes in `axi_chan_list_dump_lli()` remains unpatched in `axi_chan_block_xfer_complete()`, compounded by a TOCTOU race.
- [High] A flawed SG iteration loop in `dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_slave_sg()` exits prematurely, silently truncating transfers and causing an immediate NULL pointer dereference panic.
- [High] On descriptor allocation error paths, `axi_desc_put()` will attempt to free `NULL` pointers to the DMA pool and incorrectly subtract unallocated counts from `chan->descs_allocated`, leading to kernel panics and counter corruption.
--
commit c635f1f1d2b17ebcac96fbdff2d3244d2e75fb83
Author: Jia Wang <wangjia@ultrarisc.com>
dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Fix LLI dump out-of-bounds access
axi_chan_list_dump_lli() uses the channel-wide descs_allocated count to
walk the hw_desc[] array of a single transaction. If multiple
transactions have allocated LLIs, the channel count can exceed the
transaction-local nr_hw_descs and make the DMA error path read past the
end of hw_desc[].
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c b/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> index 742e08cfab435..858004b5a8467 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> @@ -1052,10 +1052,9 @@ static void axi_chan_dump_lli(struct axi_dma_chan *chan,
> static void axi_chan_list_dump_lli(struct axi_dma_chan *chan,
> struct axi_dma_desc *desc_head)
> {
> - int count = atomic_read(&chan->descs_allocated);
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < desc_head->nr_hw_descs; i++)
> axi_chan_dump_lli(chan, &desc_head->hw_desc[i]);
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the exact same out-of-bounds array access
bug that this commit fixes in axi_chan_list_dump_lli() remains unpatched in
axi_chan_block_xfer_complete():
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c:axi_chan_block_xfer_complete() {
...
int count = atomic_read(&chan->descs_allocated);
...
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
hw_desc = &desc->hw_desc[i];
...
}
Does this function also need to be updated to use desc->nr_hw_descs for
its loop limit? Using the channel-wide count (which is fetched outside the
channel spinlock, presenting a TOCTOU race) could cause an out-of-bounds read
on desc->hw_desc[]. If the garbage memory happens to match llp, it will modify
the memory via hw_desc->lli->ctl_hi.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_slave_sg(),
is there a flaw in the SG iteration loop?
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c:dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_slave_sg() {
...
segment_len = DIV_ROUND_UP(sg_dma_len(sg), num_segments);
...
} while (len >= segment_len);
...
write_desc_llp(hw_desc, llp | lms);
...
}
If a DMA client submits a scatter-gather list where the length does not evenly
divide into the hardware maximum block size (e.g., length 4097 and block
length 4096 gives a segment_len of 2049, leaving 2048 bytes), the condition
while (len >= segment_len) evaluates to false and exits the loop prematurely.
Does this silent truncation leave trailing descriptors uninitialized, causing an
immediate NULL pointer dereference panic when write_desc_llp() tries to access
hw_desc->lli?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does axi_desc_put() safely handle error
rollbacks?
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c:axi_desc_put() {
...
for (i = 0; i < desc->nr_hw_descs; i++) {
...
dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, hw_desc->lli, hw_desc->llp);
...
}
...
atomic_sub(descs_put, &chan->descs_allocated);
}
If descriptor initialization fails midway (e.g., due to OOM causing -ENOMEM),
the error path calls axi_desc_put(). Because it unconditionally iterates over
all desc->nr_hw_descs elements, won't it pass NULL hw_desc->lli pointers to
dma_pool_free() for unallocated entries, resulting in a panic?
Additionally, will subtracting the full capacity (descs_put) from
chan->descs_allocated cause an underflow when only partially allocated?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828-dma-fix-v1-0-a6947f487e07@ultrarisc.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 0:48 [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Fix burst length encoding and LLI dump Jia Wang
2026-08-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Fix AXI burst length encoding Jia Wang
2026-08-28 0:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-28 9:24 ` Jia Wang
2026-08-28 19:32 ` Frank Li
2026-08-31 2:29 ` Jia Wang
2026-08-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Fix LLI dump out-of-bounds access Jia Wang
2026-08-28 1:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-28 9:33 ` Jia Wang
2026-08-28 7:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-28 9:34 ` Jia Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828010412.6971A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wangjia@ultrarisc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox