From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.15] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: fix PM for system sleep and channel alloc
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:58:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831145846.054761F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831133314.4125787-209-sashal@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The shared interrupt handler accesses hardware registers without checking if the device is active, and the suspend callback fails to synchronize IRQs.
--
commit 11e86e3a3829f6e35823522311eef18dacb1afef
Author: Tze Yee Ng <tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: fix PM for system sleep and channel alloc
The driver only had runtime PM callbacks. If a channel stayed allocated
across system suspend/resume, the runtime usage count could remain
non-zero while hardware state (DMAC_CFG, clocks) was lost, and
axi_dma_runtime_resume() would not run to restore it.
Add system-sleep PM ops that use pm_runtime_force_suspend() and
pm_runtime_force_resume() so suspend/resume reuses the existing
axi_dma_suspend() and axi_dma_resume() paths.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/18bf778a3a1cc2f377ef8eb0d1508d8ac6371896.1779688569.git.tze.yee.ng@altera.com
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c b/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> index b23536645ff7c..4fd77f5b67c47 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1654,6 +1659,8 @@ static void dw_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_axi_dma_pm_ops = {
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
> + pm_runtime_force_resume)
> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(axi_dma_runtime_suspend, axi_dma_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the shared interrupt handler have a
potential race condition with device suspend?
The driver requests a shared interrupt:
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c:axi_req_irqs() {
...
ret = devm_request_irq(chip->dev, chip->irq[i], dw_axi_dma_interrupt,
IRQF_SHARED, KBUILD_MODNAME, chip);
...
}
However, the interrupt handler accesses hardware registers unconditionally:
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c:dw_axi_dma_interrupt() {
...
axi_dma_irq_disable(chip);
...
}
If another device on the same shared IRQ line triggers an interrupt while this
DMA controller is runtime suspended (with clocks disabled), could this cause a
bus hang or system crash when accessing unclocked registers?
Additionally, the suspend routine cuts clocks without synchronizing IRQs:
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c:axi_dma_suspend() {
...
clk_disable_unprepare(chip->core_clk);
clk_disable_unprepare(chip->cfgr_clk);
...
}
Could an in-flight IRQ handler crash when the clocks are cut mid-execution?
Should the interrupt handler use pm_runtime_get_if_active() to check if the
device is active before proceeding, and should the suspend callback call
synchronize_irq() to ensure no handler is executing before disabling the clocks?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831133314.4125787-209-sashal@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260831133314.4125787-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2026-08-31 13:23 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.15] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: fix PM for system sleep and channel alloc Sasha Levin
2026-08-31 14:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-6.12] dmaengine: altera-msgdma: Use memcpy_toio for descriptor FIFO writes Sasha Levin
2026-08-31 15:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831145846.054761F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox