From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: disable channels before freeing on registration failure
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:38:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902063801.D8F281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902062153.31048-7-logang@deltatee.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Premature registration of chan_status_irq allows the ISR to execute before channels are initialized, causing NULL pointer dereferences.
- [High] Missing ioremap() return value check in switchtec_dma_create() can lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
--
commit 5a07655c2107e09316788ad5789b3b1db4682eda
Author: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
dmaengine: switchtec-dma: disable channels before freeing on registration failure
This commit addresses an issue in switchtec_dma_create() where an error during
or after channel enumeration could leave the channel status IRQ active. It
introduces switchtec_dma_chans_disable() to free the IRQ before channels are
released and freed, preventing the IRQ from firing mid-teardown.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260717223431.625EE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260721162822.05CDD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c b/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
> index 430b09fa5102e..63f80e2a5b6f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1321,6 +1331,7 @@ static int switchtec_dma_create(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> err_chans_release_exit:
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential NULL
pointer dereference earlier in switchtec_dma_create() in
drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c.
Can switchtec_dma_create() crash if ioremap() fails? The code maps the PCI BAR
but does not check the return value:
swdma_dev->bar = ioremap(pci_resource_start(pdev, 0),
pci_resource_len(pdev, 0));
If ioremap() returns NULL due to memory exhaustion or an invalid resource, the
subsequent readw() will cause a page fault:
irq = readw(swdma_dev->bar + SWITCHTEC_REG_CHAN_STS_VEC);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed another problem with the IRQ
registration in switchtec_dma_create() in drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c.
Could the interrupt fire before the channel list is initialized? The IRQ is
requested and enabled before dma_dev->channels is initialized:
rc = pci_request_irq(pdev, irq, NULL, switchtec_dma_chan_status_isr,
swdma_dev, KBUILD_MODNAME);
If the hardware asserts the interrupt immediately after it is requested,
switchtec_dma_chan_status_isr() will execute and locklessly iterate over the
zero-initialized dma_dev->channels list:
list_for_each_entry(chan, &dma_dev->channels, device_node) {
This leads to iterating over a negative offset pointer, and reading
swdma_chan->dma_chan.dev will fault. Furthermore, even if the list was
initialized, dma_chan.dev is only allocated later in
dma_async_device_register(), so an early interrupt would still dereference a
NULL dev pointer.
> + switchtec_dma_chans_disable(pdev, swdma_dev);
> switchtec_dma_chans_release(pdev, swdma_dev);
> switchtec_dma_chans_free(swdma_dev);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902062153.31048-1-logang@deltatee.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 6:21 [PATCH v6 00/10] dmaengine: miscellaneous fixes for ioat, switchtec_dma and plx_dma Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix double-free in switchtec_dma_free_desc() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix resource leak in alloc_chan_resources Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix channel leak on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: make switchtec_dma_chans_release() void Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix chan_status_irq cleanup on create() error Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: disable channels before freeing on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix use-after-free of swdma_dev in remove() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] dmaengine: ioat: use sysfs_emit() in per-channel sysfs show() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] dmaengine: plx_dma: fix NULL pointer deref in plx_dma_isr() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902063801.D8F281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox