From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Devendra K Verma" <devverma@amd.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/2] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 10:24:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907102421.5641E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907101213.1917064-3-devverma@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] IRQ vectors allocated by pci_alloc_irq_vectors() are leaked on multiple error paths and during device removal.
--
commit ba0a3a6c27ea5625a5bca375aac32fcdc517816e
Author: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation
This commit updates the DMA channel register base address calculation to
support a configurable channel register space separation. It modifies the
probe functions to pass the channel space size to the chip structure.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> index 07931b1817856..fab4faf68b774 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -491,6 +494,7 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> chip->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
> chip->ops = match->plat_ops;
> chip->cfg_non_ll = dma_data->cfg_non_ll;
> + chip->ch_space_sz = dma_data->ch_space_sz;
>
> chip->ll_wr_cnt = dma_data->wr_ch_cnt;
> chip->ll_rd_cnt = dma_data->rd_ch_cnt;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential resource leak in
dw_edma_pcie_probe() regarding IRQ vector cleanup.
Does dw_edma_pcie_probe() leak IRQ vectors on error paths and during device
removal?
Earlier in dw_edma_pcie_probe(), vectors are allocated using
pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). However, multiple error paths after this point
return directly without calling pci_free_irq_vectors(). For example, if
pcim_iomap_table() fails:
chip->reg_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[dma_data->rg.bar];
if (!chip->reg_base)
return -ENOMEM;
Similar leaks appear to happen if allocating the logical link blocks fails,
or if dw_edma_probe() fails near the end of the function.
Furthermore, dw_edma_pcie_remove() does not appear to call
pci_free_irq_vectors(), which means these IRQ vectors are leaked when the
device is unbound or the module is unloaded.
According to PCI subsystem guidelines, every error path after a successful
allocation must clean up the vectors to prevent IRQ resource exhaustion.
Could we add proper error labels to clean up these vectors?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907101213.1917064-1-devverma@amd.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 10:12 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/2] CPM6 Channel Separation Support Devendra K Verma
2026-09-07 10:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 1/2] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC Devendra K Verma
2026-09-07 10:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 10:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 2/2] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation Devendra K Verma
2026-09-07 10:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907102421.5641E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=devverma@amd.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox