From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] dmaengine: bestcomm: make gen_bd init helpers static
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 19:57:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913195701.20C7A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913194804.39939-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing bounds check for `psc_num` in `bcom_psc_gen_bd_tx_init` can lead to an out-of-bounds read on the `bcom_psc_params` array, resulting in a subsequent out-of-bounds memory write.
--
commit 208dbbe4b8a05c7464d2b55c9abc2d1a2ba7e83a
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
dmaengine: bestcomm: make gen_bd init helpers static
bcom_gen_bd_rx_init() and bcom_gen_bd_tx_init() are only called from
the PSC wrapper functions in gen_bd.c, so make them static, drop
their now-unneeded exports, and remove the corresponding header
declarations.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bestcomm/gen_bd.c b/drivers/dma/bestcomm/gen_bd.c
> index 8a24a5cbc2633..abe6c19f7148e 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/bestcomm/gen_bd.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/bestcomm/gen_bd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ bcom_gen_bd_rx_release(struct bcom_task *tsk)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bcom_gen_bd_rx_release);
>
>
> -extern struct bcom_task *
> +static struct bcom_task *
> bcom_gen_bd_tx_init(int queue_len, phys_addr_t fifo,
> int initiator, int ipr)
> {
> @@ -192,7 +191,6 @@ bcom_gen_bd_tx_init(int queue_len, phys_addr_t fifo,
>
> return tsk;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bcom_gen_bd_tx_init);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does bcom_psc_gen_bd_tx_init() lack a bounds
check for psc_num before calling this function?
While bcom_psc_gen_bd_rx_init() checks if psc_num is out of bounds:
if (psc_num >= MPC52xx_PSC_MAXNUM)
return NULL;
bcom_psc_gen_bd_tx_init() does not, leading to a direct out-of-bounds read on
the statically sized bcom_psc_params array:
return bcom_gen_bd_tx_init(queue_len, fifo,
bcom_psc_params[psc_num].tx_initiator,
bcom_psc_params[psc_num].tx_ipr);
The garbage tx_initiator value read out-of-bounds is then passed to
bcom_gen_bd_tx_init() and subsequently used in bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset() as an
array index for an MMIO write:
out_8(&bcom_eng->regs->ipr[priv->initiator], priv->ipr);
This can be triggered via mpc5200_audio_dma_create() in
sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c, where the caller blindly passes the id derived
from the device-tree 'cell-index' property:
psc_dma->playback.bcom_task =
bcom_psc_gen_bd_tx_init(psc_dma->id, 10, fifo);
Since it calls tx_init before checking the result of rx_init, the out-of-bounds
read and write will unconditionally execute on a bad ID before any error path
can bail out.
Could a bounds check be added to bcom_psc_gen_bd_tx_init()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260913194804.39939-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 19:48 [PATCHv2] dmaengine: bestcomm: make gen_bd init helpers static Rosen Penev
2026-09-13 19:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260913195701.20C7A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox