Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] Canaan devicetree fixes

Conor.Dooley
2022-08-11T06:27:38Z

On 10/08/2022 23:01, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2022 10:51:00 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 14/07/2022 23:11, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote:
>>> On 14/07/2022 23:04, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to sort out how to merge this one.  I'm not opposed to taking it through the RISC-V tree as Rob's reviewed/acked the bindings, but just figured I'd say something before putting anything on for-next to try and minimize confusion.
>>>>
>>>> Unless I'm missing something it's just patch 3 that's been taken so far, via Vinod's tree.  I've dropped that one and put the rest on palmer/riscv-canaan_dt_schema, if that looks good then I'll take it into riscv/for-next when this loops back to the top of my queue.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Patches 1 & 2 never got review from the DRM side and patch 12
>>> depends on those. If it comes to it, you could drop those three
>>> (and patch 3 that Vinod took). The only other one is patch 4,
>>> which has Krzysztof's ack as memory-controller maintainer, so
>>> that one should be okay.
>>
>> Hey Palmer,
>> These fixes have been sitting on palmer/riscv-canaan_dt_schema for
>> a few weeks now, without an autobuilder complaint etc. Could you
>> move it onto for-next?
>
> These are on for-next.

Sweet, nearly clear of dtbs_check problems now :)
Thanks!