From: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
To: "Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Respond TX done if DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT is not requested
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:27:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37d51cde-de15-0cee-cd4b-ecaf5511fd2b@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d4eb194-aab7-42c7-f33f-4b89e607dc6c@gmail.com>
Hi Peter,
On 22/08/22 18:42, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 22/08/2022 12:15, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
>> When the DMA consumer driver does not expect the callback for TX done,
>> There is no need to perform the channel RT byte counter calculations
>> and estimate the completion but return complete on first attempt itself.
>> This assumes that the consumer who did not request DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT
>> has its own mechanism for understanding TX completion, example: MCSPI
>> EOW interrupt can be used as TX completion signal for a SPI transaction.
>
> The check is in place to make sure that we don't leave stale data in the
> DMA fabric.
> If you drop the check then it is going to be possible that some TX data
> is going to be lost.
> Could be one out of 10K transfers or 100K, but if that happens it is not
> going to be easy to figure out.
> Let's say we go the packet back, but PDMA is still have data to send and
> the IP stops transmitting (externally clocked bus, some delay, etc).
> Is it going to be OK to disable the channel?
>
Thanks for the feedback, yes the check is necessary for most of the cases
but there needs to be a way to disable the check for consumers which can
identify the end of transaction using some other internal mechanism/interrupt.
For example the MCSPI controller has an End of Word(EOW) interrupt when the
said number of bytes has been clocked out, in this case the EOW interrupt
being raised guarantees that there is no stale data in DMA fabric.Using
the EOW interrupt to identify the completion of a transaction significantly
improves the transaction speed since we need not now wait for the slower DMA
TX completion calculation.
This commit tries to bypass the check only if the consumer did not request
it by not passing the DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT flag, in other cases the check
should not be bypassed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> index 39b330ada200..03d579068453 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ struct udma_chan_config {
>> enum udma_tp_level channel_tpl; /* Channel Throughput Level */
>>
>> u32 tr_trigger_type;
>> + unsigned long tx_flags;
>>
>> /* PKDMA mapped channel */
>> int mapped_channel_id;
>> @@ -1057,7 +1058,7 @@ static bool udma_is_desc_really_done(struct udma_chan *uc, struct udma_desc *d)
>>
>> /* Only TX towards PDMA is affected */
>> if (uc->config.ep_type == PSIL_EP_NATIVE ||
>> - uc->config.dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
>> + uc->config.dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV || !(uc->config.tx_flags & DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT))
>> return true;
>>
>> peer_bcnt = udma_tchanrt_read(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_PEER_BCNT_REG);
>> @@ -3418,6 +3419,8 @@ udma_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>> if (!burst)
>> burst = 1;
>>
>> + uc->config.tx_flags = tx_flags;
>> +
>> if (uc->config.pkt_mode)
>> d = udma_prep_slave_sg_pkt(uc, sgl, sglen, dir, tx_flags,
>> context);
>
--
Regards,
Vaishnav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 9:15 [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-omap2-mcspi: Use EOW interrupt for transfer completion Vaishnav Achath
2022-08-22 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Respond TX done if DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT is not requested Vaishnav Achath
2022-08-22 13:12 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2022-08-23 6:57 ` Vaishnav Achath [this message]
2022-09-02 14:20 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2022-09-05 3:02 ` Vaishnav Achath
2022-09-10 18:57 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2022-08-22 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi-omap2-mcspi: Use EOW interrupt for completion when DMA enabled Vaishnav Achath
2022-08-22 13:14 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37d51cde-de15-0cee-cd4b-ecaf5511fd2b@ti.com \
--to=vaishnav.a@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox