From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED3C2686A5; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739553754; cv=none; b=D0zPrWtVtU19TcwLVyrGL7j3LBKu+mOZo83+f8QP70QhUCE4aLDY/A9xMfgI4OFQYC5hzG19tIDLUBoOah+haiQBWq8/lD+whFLeqsPtjyZkRGaiD2uY50puNARKA5/fcQB2a6NWxWHwVOFlISenqghcECtEiGtlP9H+kP0Lf28= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739553754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DPQdmghsK7jEQ7jsF+P1vpaIBGgBftXHy4VvMzKvPpQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=elLIZA7FqCGBpV/R+tHRMBRgDaBBIC0qyN9QxhedmjQVFlPWS3uiyBxvNMdvjhx2yAx+K8ORMix0wqIb1mStnPIpHLTupnR52o/Pkg6Ea6neuIEXsW0bGvzfLuEAirzVtzBZPoXkQYlwGL7thEE2f/MfvYEjNTzYjDP+Ij9qssY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mfKtbrpw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mfKtbrpw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739553753; x=1771089753; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DPQdmghsK7jEQ7jsF+P1vpaIBGgBftXHy4VvMzKvPpQ=; b=mfKtbrpw6mrkhIu4HpDSma8J2fo4r+zUqXh6UsJUhvPd/aOYs3Gl/nLV T84X7ezmkGuiDpzgfY62w1lRgc2u8U8eIDS+jqmMxMbnKmvusMG02KYls INhC+DX22kR4XZH40mIKb1hr8MIoi+hH3lGCVeHqpG/oek64a1cWmSmXS k126xHNLEpYyXnKLOR7YUg/RmOBhPX/LqujN71BmHU7YaEZ5cs/f4poys QteRd75Koh7sPOZkK3JTf2sdQFOa03tiF7XAb/048gQ4S3N93eg0gfOt1 temm15JHlKxujU04xg2r6cfFfOxLWsbXoT7IGA79OClGFQyy7CGQwDumX Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lsvpmlSyRTmIqzrZGytYIA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wyW/InxiTfS5F7sLJnjRlQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11345"; a="40181572" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,286,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="40181572" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2025 09:22:32 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: c/VwesapRja7LYYHnQz68Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SeOk57vJQSiMVzrLWl5jpA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,286,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="113487381" Received: from lstrano-mobl6.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.125.109.34]) ([10.125.109.34]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2025 09:22:31 -0800 Message-ID: <3bcf7b21-d894-4aa1-ba00-d32a32a72b2d@intel.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:22:30 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: idxd: fix memory leak in error handling path To: Markus Elfring , Shuai Xue , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , Vinicius Costa Gomes , Vinod Koul References: <20250110082237.21135-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <61c9c416-711c-44dc-87af-b1aefc76b87e@web.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Dave Jiang In-Reply-To: <61c9c416-711c-44dc-87af-b1aefc76b87e@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2/14/25 10:15 AM, Markus Elfring wrote: > … >> drivers/dma/idxd/init.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > … > > How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) > for the presented patches accordingly? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc2#n145 I actually thought about asking for that. But I believe the fixes are against code that just went in for 6.14 so backporting won't be necessary. > > Regards, > Markus